My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-05-27 Council WS & Meeting Minutes - Approved
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2023
>
2020
>
2020-05-27 Council WS & Meeting Minutes - Approved
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2021 11:16:36 AM
Creation date
2/17/2021 11:16:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />May 27, 2020 <br /> <br />City Administrator Statz stated that if the City choses to continue with the current provider (North <br />Memorial/Allina) there would be no need to pass the resolution but it would do no harm in <br />reaffirming the City’s choice for provider as it coincides with North Memorial and Allina’s merger. <br /> <br />Council Member Lakso had concerns if the services were not meeting the community’s needs and <br />asked if it could be reviewed in six (6) months. <br /> <br />Mr. Steve King, 1724 Sorel Street desired to ensure that a contract was not being signed for a five <br />(5) year period similar to that of the Garbage/Recycling contract. Administrator Statz stated that <br />in this case there is no need for contract and the City can change their mind down the road and we <br />cannot give exclusive rights to any one provider as there are mutual aid type agreements that allow <br />for available services to provide services if one provider cannot. The resolution states “Preferred <br />Service Provider”. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Lakso, seconded by Council Member Koski to Adopt Res. #20- <br />016a – Appointing M Health as the City’s Primary Ambulance Service Provider w/A Review <br />Period of Six (6) Months Ensuring Meeting Needs of Community. A roll-call vote was taken. <br />Mayor Love and Council Members Koski, Lakso & Wilharber voted in favor. Council <br />Member Montain – Nay. Motion carried 4-1. <br /> <br />2. Stormwater Fund Rate Increase <br /> <br />Finance Director DeJong stated that in February the Council discussed the Storm Water Utility <br />Fees. He stated that he included information regarding several scenarios in the packet for <br />consideration. Director DeJong stated that he included scenarios for a zero percent increase, a 4% <br />increase and a 5% increase. He stated that staff would recommend a 5% increase due to the <br />Downtown Street Improvement Project and the expansion of the irrigation system which will <br />utilize a rather large amount of the current funds. He stated that Staff felt that a 5% increase would <br />replenish the account rather quickly and it would provide additional funding for backyard storm <br />water remediation for resident assistance. Discussion included ditch and pond maintenance, <br />anticipated service needs, costs of maintenance, costs estimates relating the maintenance of 72 <br />public wet ponds during a 10 year period each at approximately $14,400/year with a total <br />obligation of $144,000 and staff’s recommendation to commence the program in 2021. He stated <br />that Staff also estimated removal of sediment from ditches would be approximately $40/foot. <br />Director DeJong stated that the City maintains 14 ditches and cleaning of ditches would be over a <br />10 year period also. He stated that in scenario one (1) the balance to the Storm Water Fund would <br />go negative in 2026, in scenario two (2) with a 4% increase the City would drop below the cash <br />target in 2020 and by 2021 would be back over the minimum cash balance with it rising until 2024 <br />when backyards could be addressed. He stated that scenario three (3) was for a 5% increase in <br />fees. He stated that fees would be reevaluated annually based upon updated projections and MS4 <br />requirements. He felt that the impact to residents would be minimal and did not anticipate any <br />other rate significant increases in other utility funds. <br /> <br />Council Member Wilharber asked what the increase would be per household and Director <br />DeJong stated a couple of dollars per year which was very modest. <br /> <br />Page 7 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.