Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />5. Demolitions <br />City of Minneapolis v. <br />State statutes, as well as some city ordinances, provide for the destruction <br />Meldahl, 607 N.W.2d 168 <br />of buildings, structures, or other nuisance situations. As a drastic, <br />(Minn. Ct. App. 2000). <br />Minn. Stat. § 463.16. <br />irreversible solution to nuisance conditions, demolitions should only be <br />See LMC information memo, <br />used as a last resort and after all statutory and procedural requirements are <br />Dangerous Properties. <br />strictly followed. When repairs or alterations can be made to remedy a <br />hazardous situation, repairs should generally be ordered, rather than <br />destruction of the property. <br /> <br />VIII. Enforcement decisions <br /> <br />There is no blueprint for effective nuisance enforcement. Each city <br /> <br />responds to nuisance activities in its own manner, based upon city finances <br />See Part VIII – C – <br />Inspection-based <br />and staffing needs, as well as the community’s interest or concerns. Some <br />enforcement <br />cities take a proactive approach to nuisance enforcement, sending officials <br /> <br />See Part VIII – B – <br />out into neighborhoods, industrial parks, and business districts, actively <br />Complaint-based <br />looking for code violations. In others, the response is more reactive, <br />enforcement. <br /> <br />relying more on complaints than active investigating. The approach that is <br /> <br />ultimately used should be formally adopted by city policy. It should be <br />specific enough to defend against claims of unequal treatment, yet with <br />enough flexibility to allow for different circumstances that may arise. <br /> <br />A. Enforcement officers <br /> <br />Cities need to decide who is responsible for enforcing their nuisance <br />Minn. Stat. § 412.231. <br />regulations. As ordinance violations are misdemeanor offenses, city law <br /> <br />enforcement will certainly play a significant role. However, when <br />regulating nuisances, cities can also rely on: <br /> <br /> City administration. <br />Civilian code enforcement officers. <br />Hearing officers. <br />Building inspectors. <br />Animal control officials. <br />Public works, street, or sanitation department officials. <br /> State officials (MPCA, Building Codes & Standards, DNR). <br />Private contractors. <br /> <br />A city’s investment into nuisance code enforcement will vary, based upon <br /> <br />city priorities, needs, and resources. It is important to consider these <br />factors when drafting city ordinances or policies. Ordinances and policies <br />that a city will not have the ability to enforce should not be adopted. <br /> <br />It may seem appealing to make nuisance enforcement the responsibility of <br />a single person or department, so the city knows who is handling all <br />nuisance issues. However, because of the variety of responsibilities and <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 4/16/2020 <br />Public Nuisances Page 20 <br /> <br />