My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-03-09 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2022
>
2022-03-09 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2022 2:21:24 PM
Creation date
3/7/2022 4:43:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />Council Work Session & City Council Meeting Minutes <br />December 8, 2021 <br />Downtown Street Project the fund balance was less than adequate. He explained that the funds <br />are utilized for storm water management (i.e., regular pond and ditch maintenance along with <br />addressing backyard drainage issues and to fund over the long term with evaluation over the years). <br />He stated that that if Council chose to consider this proposal it would be a .49 cent increase from <br />$9.77 to $10.26 and an offset to water from the current fee of $13.38 to $12.89. Council Member <br />Koski asked how this was billed. Finance Director DeJong stated through residents utility bills on <br />a bi-monthly basis. Council Member Koski stated that at some point infrastructure would need to <br />be repaired and he would rather have the fund healthy on an ongoing basis rather than increase <br />taxes for such repairs. Finance DeJong stated that what is being proposed is for storm sewer funds. <br />Council Member Mosher desired to leave where at and asked if Council requested that the fee be <br />increased annually for five years, in what years was the City in that. Finance Director DeJong <br />stated year two (2). Council Member Mosher asked about the Ðspeed bumpsÑ that were being <br />experienced previously and whether these funds applied to that. City Administrator stated that <br />that was a good question and funding for those repairs he was unsure whether funding came from <br />Street Funds but would get back with those expenditures as it was the storm sewer that caused <br />these. <br /> <br />Lengthy discussion ensued regarding the offset of the increase with the water fee, the fund being <br />depleted due to Street Project and Irrigation Project in the Downtown, monitoring depth of <br />sediment on ponds, general practice being that ponds should be dredged every 25 years generally. <br />However monitoring is showing every 75 years is a better estimate if regular maintenance is <br />completed, MS4 regulations, may asked for hiring additional summer help assisting in storm water, <br />Street Fund being negative amount for a short period due to paying cash for the Street Project, <br />having a positive ending cash balance every year, accurate accounting of expenditures to proper <br />accounts and review whether increases or decreases are needed, the fund being at 30% in 2026 and <br />its regular evaluation annually, incremental planning taking care of building fund and created last <br />year, started a plan and a plan moving forward, saving plan without bonding paying cash for <br />projects and understand fund balance depleted with results, first read with voting on at next <br />meeting, last year providing a slight savings to residents due to COVID, effect of new development <br />and maybe adjustment could be made in upcoming years. <br /> <br />Mayor Love provided an opportunity for public input. No audience members desired to speak on <br />the item. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member King to Close the Public <br />Hearing at 7:06 p.m. <br />2. 2022 Budget and Truth In Taxation Hearing <br />Motion by Council Member Lakso, seconded by Council Member King to open the Public <br />Hearing for the 2022 Budget and Truth In Taxation Hearing at 7:07. All in favor. Motion <br />carried. <br />Finance Director DeJong provided an overview of the information that was contained in the packet <br />regarding the proposed budget and tax levy. He explained the process of public input, adoption of <br />the final budget and forwarding the Certified Tax Levy to Anoka County for 2022. He also <br />Page 6 of 15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.