Laserfiche WebLink
City of Centerville <br />Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission <br />January 4, 2022 <br /> <br /> <br />City Administrator Statz addressed the Commission and introduced this item. <br /> <br />Chairperson Broussard-Vickers stated she likes the updates to the ordinance and feels a 10 <br />foot setback is the best option. She noted the visual of a vehicle being parked in a yard is not <br />appealing. <br /> <br />City Administrator Statz stated the idea of a passenger vehicle being parked in a yard can <br />look unaesthetically pleasing. <br /> <br />City Planner Carlson stated it is important to take into consideration the lawn maintenance <br />that would be necessary if a vehicle is driven on and off a lawn daily, opposed to a boat <br />being pulled onto the lawn maybe twice a year. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kubat stated in the illustration he can see the allowed types of vehicles <br />proposed in certain areas but he does not see it in the language of the ordinance. <br /> <br />City Administrator Statz stated he had to look for a bit to locate the area where the language <br />Commission Kubat is referring to. He noted although it is shown in the image provided he <br />would not recommend including the picture in the ordinance. <br /> <br />City Attorney Glaser stated if the Commission does not want to allow passenger vehicles in <br />the yards they can include the wording “passenger vehicles can only be permitted on the <br />driveway” or “passenger vehicles can only parked on the driveway”, he noted that is how <br />other cities have stated it. <br /> <br />Commissioner Twohy asked about the pervious surface allotment. City Administrator Statz <br />stated they can look into that and see how they might be able to incorporate a certain <br />percentage of allowed pervious surfaces. <br /> <br />City Administrator Statz reviewed the input from the Commission. He stated the <br />Commission is in a 4-3 split on the length that should be proposed for the setback, with 4 <br />Commissioners being in favor of a 5 foot setback. He stated the consensus of the <br />Commission was to review the treatment of the Royal Meadows Develoment and other areas <br />similar in nature, review the wings, and add some clarification on passenger vehicles and <br />their operability. <br /> <br />VII. NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br />1. Ordinance Review – Section 111.16 – Liquor Regulations <br /> <br />City Administrator Statz introduced this item. He explained the intent of the law and stated <br />he is just looking for discussion and input from the Commissioners. <br /> <br />Chairperson Broussard-Vickers stated she does not see the need for this at the moment. <br /> <br />Commissioner Twohy asked if they have had any issues that this ordinance would cover. <br /> <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />