My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-02-06 P & Z Packet
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2024
>
2024-02-06 P & Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2024 7:37:44 AM
Creation date
1/31/2024 7:37:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br /> <br />2. Meetings that must be closed <br />There are some meetings that the open meeting law requires to be closed. <br />The following meetings must be closed: <br /> <br />a. Misconduct allegations <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D.05, subd. <br />A public body must close a meeting for preliminary consideration of <br />2(b). <br />allegations or charges against an individual subject to the public body’s <br />Minn. Stat. § 13.43, subd. <br />2(4). <br />authority. <br />DPO 03-020. <br />DPO 14-004. <br />The commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Administration has <br />advised that a city could not close a meeting under this exception to <br />consider allegations of misconduct against a job applicant who had been <br />extended a conditional offer of employment. <br /> <br />(The job applicant was not a city employee). The commissioner reasoned <br />that the city council had no authority to discipline the job applicant or to <br />direct his actions in any way; therefore, he was not “an individual subject <br />to its authority.” <br />DPO 10-001. <br />The commissioner has also advised that a recording of a closed meeting <br />Minn. Stat. § 13.43. <br />for preliminary consideration of misconduct allegations is private <br />personnel data under Minn. Stat. § 13.43, subd. 4, and is accessible to the <br />subject of the data but not to the public. The commissioner noted that at <br />some point in time, some or all of the data on the tape may become public <br />under Minn. Stat. § 13.43, subd. 2. <br /> <br />For example, if the employee is disciplined and there is a final disposition, <br />certain personnel data becomes public. <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D.01, subd. 3. <br />The following procedure must be used to close a meeting under this <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D.05, subd. 1. <br />exception: <br /> Before closing the meeting, the council must state on the record the <br /> <br /> specific grounds for closing the meeting and describe the subject to be <br /> <br />discussed. <br />Note: There is a special <br />provision dealing with <br /> The meeting must be open at the request of the individual who is the <br />allegations of law <br />subject of the meeting. Thus, the individual should be given advance <br />enforcement personnel <br />misconduct; see Minn. Stat. § <br />notice of the existence and nature of the charges against him or her, so <br />13D.05, subd. 2(a) and <br />that the individual can make a decision. <br />section II.G.2.b.- Certain not- <br />public data. <br />The meeting must be electronically recorded, and the recording must <br /> <br />be preserved for at least three years after the meeting. <br /> <br /> <br />If the public body decides that discipline of any nature may be <br /> <br />warranted regarding the specific charges, further meetings must be <br /> <br /> <br />open. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Handbook for Minnesota Cities 7/11/2023 <br />Meetings, Motions, Resolutions, and Ordinances Chapter 7 | Page 18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.