My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-02-06 P & Z Packet
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2024
>
2024-02-06 P & Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2024 7:37:44 AM
Creation date
1/31/2024 7:37:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br /> <br />The open meeting law does not define the term “social media,” but this <br />term is generally understood to mean forms of electronic communication, <br />including websites for social networking like Facebook, LinkedIn, <br />Instagram, and Twitter through which users create online communities to <br />share information, ideas, and other content. <br />It is important to remember that the use of social media by council <br />members could still be used to support other claims such as claims of <br />defamation or of conflict of interest in decision-making. As a result, <br />council members should make sure that any comments they make on <br />social media are factually correct and should not comment on issues that <br />will come before the council in the future for a quasi-judicial hearing and <br />decision, such as the consideration of whether to grant an application for a <br />conditional use permit. <br />See II-H-5 - Serial meetings. <br />It is also important to remember that serial discussions between less than a <br />quorum of the council could violate the open meeting law under certain <br />circumstances. <br /> <br />As a result, city councils and other public bodies should take a <br />conservative approach and should not use telephone calls, email, or other <br />technology to communicate back and forth with other members of the <br />public body if both of the following circumstances exist: <br /> <br /> A quorum of the council or public body will be contacted regarding <br />the same matter. <br /> Official business is being discussed. <br />Minn. Stat. § 13.02, subd. 7. <br />Another thing council members should be careful about is which email <br />account they use to receive emails relating to city business because such <br />emails likely would be considered government data that is subject to a <br />public-records request under the Minnesota Government Data Practices <br />Act (MGDPA). <br />The best option would be for each council member to have an individual <br />email account that the city provides, and city staff manage. However, this <br />is not always possible for cities due to budget, size, or logistics. <br /> If council members don’t have a city email account, there are some things <br />to think about before using a personal email account for city business. <br />First, preferably only the council member should have access to the <br />personal email account. Using a shared account with other family <br />members could lead to incorrect information being communicated from <br />the account, or incoming information being inadvertently deleted. Also, <br />since city emails are government data, city officials may have to separate <br />personal emails from city emails when responding to a public-records <br />request under the MGDPA. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Handbook for Minnesota Cities 7/11/2023 <br />Meetings, Motions, Resolutions, and Ordinances Chapter 7 | Page 25 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.