My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-01-02 P & Z Minutes - Approved
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2024
>
2024-01-02 P & Z Minutes - Approved
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2024 10:11:05 AM
Creation date
3/11/2024 10:11:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />Planning and Zoning Commission <br />January 2, 2024 <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Olson, seconded by Commissioner Nelson to accept the resignation <br />of Les Kuiper. All in favor. Motion carried. <br /> <br />2. Election of a Chair and Vice Chair <br />Assistant Administrator Lewis introduced this item as presented in the packet. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Thompson, seconded by Commissioner Olson to appoint <br />Commissioner Krueger as Chair. All in favor. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Olson, seconded by Commissioner Thompson to appoint <br />Commissioner Olson as Vice Chair. All in favor. Motion carried. <br /> <br />3. Concept Plan – LaLonde Redevelopment – Ebert Companies <br />Assistant Administrator Lewis introduced this item as presented in the packet. Assistant <br />Administrator Lewis reviewed the staff memo, shared Commissioner Broussard-Vicker’s concerns <br />about parking (not enough) and provided comments from the city planner. <br /> <br />Comments from the city planner: <br />1) Concept. The basic development concept and land use for 3-story apartments is very good. <br />Higher density housing is needed in Downtown Centerville to provide a critical mass of <br />activity. Parking under the building is a good idea for resident convenience and site <br />aesthetics. <br /> <br />2) Density. The density of 90-110 units on 2.9 acres comes to about 31-38 un/ac, within the <br />range of 12-45 un/ac in the Downtown mixed-use district and totally appropriate. This is <br />where Centerville should have its highest density. <br /> <br />3) Orientation. The orientation of the building and site amenities facing out to the lake is <br />appropriate for this setting and would be very attractive to residents and respectful of the <br />lake environment. <br /> <br />4) Placement/Use of Site. The concept completely fills the site out to the north and east sides, <br />leaving little room for green space at the entry experience or buffering on those two sides. <br />On the north side the structure would rise most of its four levels very close to the lot line, <br />shadowing the yards of the existing homes about 200 ft away. Allowing the building and <br />parking right up to Westview Street on the south is acceptable and appropriate for <br />Downtown, however. <br /> <br />5) Grading/Topography. The site topography is a challenge. The property slopes about 30 ft <br />from the existing homestead down to Main Street toward the lake. The 3D perspective may <br />not accurately capture the grading needed for this development concept. If the east side <br />parking lot and entry are set at about existing grade in those locations, the 24-stall SW <br />parking lot might need a tall retaining wall on its west side to make grade down to Main <br />Street. On the north side toward the existing single-family neighbors there would likely be <br />a long-exposed façade of the parking level. There may be ways to work better with the <br />natural slope of the lot. <br /> <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.