2024-04-03 P & R Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

RELEVANT LINKS: Minn. Stat. § 13D.06, subd. 2. An action to enforce this penalty may be brought by any person in any O’Keefe v. Carter, No. A12- court of competent jurisdiction where the administrative office of the 0811 (Minn. Ct. App. Dec. 31, 2012) (unpublished governing body is located. decision). In an unpublished decision, the Minnesota Court of Appeals concluded that this broad grant of jurisdiction authorized a member of a town board to bring an action against his own town board for alleged violations of the open meeting law. This same decision also concluded that a two-year statute of limitations applies to lawsuits under the open meeting law. Minn. Stat. § 13D.06, subd. 4. The court may also award reasonable costs, disbursements, and attorney See LMC information memo, fees of up to $13,000 to any party in an action alleging a violation of the LMCIT Liability Coverage Guide, for information about open meeting law. The court may award costs and attorney fees to a insurance coverage for defendant only if the action is found to be frivolous and without merit. A lawsuits under the open meeting law. public body may pay any costs, disbursements, or attorney fees incurred by or awarded against any of its members. Minn. Stat. § 13D.06, subd. 4. If a party prevails in a lawsuit under the open meeting law, an award of reasonable attorney fees is mandatory if the court determines that the public body was the subject of a prior written advisory opinion from the commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Administration, and the court finds that the opinion is directly related to the lawsuit and that the public body did not act in conformity with the opinion. A court is required to give deference to the advisory opinion. Minn. Stat. § 13D.06, subd. 4 No monetary penalties or attorney fees may be awarded against a member (d). Coalwell v. Murray, No. of a public body unless the court finds that there was intent to violate the C6-95-2436 (Minn. Ct. App. Aug 6, 1996) (unpublished open meeting law. decision). Elseth v. Hille, No A12-1496 (Minn. Ct. App. May 13, 2013) (unpublished decision). Minn. Stat. § 13D.06, subd. 3 If a person is found to have intentionally violated the open meeting law in (a). Brown v. Cannon Falls three or more separate actions involving the same governing body, that Twp., 723 N.W.2d 31 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006). person must forfeit any further right to serve on the governing body or in any other capacity with the public body for a period of time equal to the term of office the person was serving. Minn. Stat. § 13D.06, subd. 3 If a court finds a separate, third violation that is unrelated to the previous (b). violations, it must declare the position vacant and notify the appointing authority or clerk of the governing body. As soon as practicable, the appointing authority or governing body shall fill the position as in the case Minn. Const. art. VIII, § 5. of any other vacancy. Under the Minnesota Constitution, the Legislature may provide for the removal of public officials for malfeasance or nonfeasance. League of Minnesota Cities Handbook for Minnesota Cities 7/11/2023 Meetings, Motions, Resolutions, and Ordinances Chapter 7 | Page 27