2024-08-14 CC Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City of Centerville Planning and Zoning Commission June 4, 2024 height and mass of the building do not protect the integrity of the surrounding residential neighborhoods and the design of the building is not consistent with architectural design standards in the referenced Master Plan. The Master Plan limits projects to three stories, whereas the proposed project would rise more than three levels on the western north side. Paragraph 156.21 conditional use permit that it does not harmonize with the existing surroundings, talking about safety in proximity to the Centerville Elementary School for the school children playing. Number seven, the Master Plan denotes that the downtown neighborhood is reserved for mid-rise housing. The proposed project of three to four levels and over 40 feet in height does not fit this description. The cityÓs comprehensive plan policy has a goal to protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible and offensive uses and to identify areas appropriate for multifamily housing opportunities. The LaLonde property is incompatible and inappropriate for this scale and size of the project. Considering its proximity to the elementary school, and adjacent to single-family homes. The applicant has not presented enough information as to the public benefit of the PUD. The public benefits do not outweigh the relaxation of standards of being requested. And, lastly, the safety of people walking across Main Street. Commissioner Seppala yay, Commissioner Kalina Yay, Commissioner Nelson yay, Commissioner McCabe nay, Commissioner Thompson, Nay Commissioner Olson Nay, Commissioner Krueger, nay. Motion failed 4 to 3. A different motion was made to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat and conditional use permit for a planned unit development with the findings outlined in the Stantec memo under the Enhanced Recommendations and Conditions Heading. Motion by Commissioner Thompson, seconded by Chair Krueger to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat and conditional use permit for a planned unit development with the findings outlined in the staff memo and the Stantec Enhanced Recommendations and Conditions. Discussion ensued about lighting, height, materials, parking, garbage and recycling, screening, and the other conditions in the enhanced Stantec memo. Commissioner Seppala requested an amendment to have the building façade approved by the planning and zoning Commission in addition to the planner and engineer. Commissioner Thompson accepted this change. Commissioner Seppala requested an amendment to have the planning commission approve the final construction plans as they relate to luxury materials and luxury amenities. Commissioner Thompson accepted this change. Commissioner Seppala requested an amendment to for the height of the fence on the east side to be 6Ó and 8Óon the north side of the building. Commissioner Thompson accepted this change. Commissioner Seppala requested an amendment to the exterior conditions to include the apartment along with proof of parking. Commissioner Thompson accepted this change. Condition 11 was removed and substituted for condition 23 (proof of parking). Commissioner Nelson requested an amendment to include submission of a defined written snow removal plan. Commissioner Thompson accepted this change. Page 11 of 16