2024-08-14 CC Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City of Centerville Planning and Zoning Commission July 9, 2024 that the resident could expand his driveway the width of his garage without a variance, and this is approximately 7 feet. VI. OLD BUSINESS 1. Review of Committee By-Laws Administrator Statz introduced this item as presented in the packet. Discussion ensued about the process for amendments and friendly amendments to motions. Administrator Statz also noted that if there is a question about a motion on the floor, then it is appropriate for someone to call for a point of order at the meeting (not after the meeting). Chair Krueger acknowledged Resident Cara Johnson at 1862 Partridge Place, allowing her to address the Commission to speak about a letter she sent staff the day after the vote on the LaLonde property. Ms. Johson stated that she really appreciated the follow-up and that going forward, she would like to advocate that the city follow RobertÓs Rules of Order on matters that are of extreme importance to the town; she added that she would like to see the city lean out of going through a friendly amendment process as it would help bring confidence to the way the city is making decisions. NEW BUSINESS 1. Development Concept Review Î Eric Marshall Property Î 7216 & 7230 LaValle Drive. Administrator Statz introduced this item as presented in the packet, reviewing the 3-lot concept and the 2 two-lot concepts (as outlined in the staff memo). Property owner Eric Marshall addressed the Commission, explaining that he is looking for the best use for his property. Mr. Marshall explained that he met with Administrator Statz to discuss concepts, adding that he brought some plans to the city about six years ago, but paused pursuing anything due to some personal circumstances. Mr. Marshall addressed the Commission to gauge their interest in considering a planned unit development (PUD) on his property. Discussion ensued about setbacks, ponding, height, home price, timeline to get started, and flex points at Bay View Villas. The consensus among the Commission is that they would entertain further discussion on a PUD. 2. Review Downtown Guiding Document Inconsistencies & Next Steps to Address Them Administrator Statz introduced this item as presented in the packet, reviewing his slides and staff recommendations (noted at the bottom of each PowerPoint slide). Discussion ensued about density, height, definitions (of story and floor), parking (ratio and in height consideration), parameters of the downtown, architecture and the inclusion of examples of French-Canadian architecture. Discussion ensued about the process for making tweaks to the existing plan and/or recommending a moratorium on planned unit developments (PUDs) in the downtown while more substantial changes are made to the Downtown Master Plan. The consensus among Commissioners is to recommend that the City Council approve a moratorium, so Administrator Statz reviewed the next steps. Motion by Commissioner Seppala seconded by Commissioner Kalina to Approve the Agenda as revised. All in favor. Motion carried. 3. Submittal of Proposed 2025 P&Z Budget to the City Council Page 3 of 4