My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-08-14 CC Packet - Revised
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2024
>
2024-08-14 CC Packet - Revised
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2024 4:56:04 PM
Creation date
8/14/2024 4:55:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville Planning and <br />Zoning Commission <br />June 4, 2024 <br />Attorney Glaser added that the city has a legal duty to approve a lot split if the applicant meets <br />whatever criteria applies, and as a city, we do not have to have a reason or duty to ask. Attorney <br />Glaser added that private landowners have rights to do with their property whatever the law allows <br />them to do and that itÓs our job as a city to effectuate that, and in this case, thatÓs exactly what the <br />situation is. The applicant wants to split the lot and take advantage of the TIF tools, and the way they <br />decided to do it qualifies under the city rules, therefore we must let him do it. <br />Slide 3 Î Density <br />The proposed density meets the Zoning Code. Administrator Statz said stated that the code was <br />recently changed to align with the Master Plan and Downtown Master Plan, adding that we were <br />quite open about that. We had a public hearing and there was one person that commented. It was <br />explained why we were doing it, adding that because we knew there was a proposal, and in reviewing <br />it and others that we have received or talked about with developers previously, we understood that <br />density was appropriate for the scale and size of the buildings that were contemplated in the <br />downtown master plan for this district. <br /> <br />Slide 4 Î Building Height <br />Administrator Statz reviewed the definition of building height, which is the vertical distance from the <br />average elevation of the finished grade at the front of the building, to the highest point of the roof for <br />flat roofs. He noted that no structures or buildings may be erected to a height exceeding 35 feet without <br />the issuance of a conditional use permit (CUP). He reviewed (city code 156.121) provisions for <br />increases to building height with a CUP. Administrator Statz noted that a conditional use permit is <br />allowed with reasonable conditions. He added that all development in this district is done through a <br />conditional use permit and planned unit development and that in the staffÓs view, this building meets <br />the definition of height requirements in the city code. <br />Commissioner Thompson asked if the Commission could deny a conditional use permit on the height <br />of a building. <br />Administrator Statz stated that they could not deny a conditional use permit if the building meets the <br />conditions. Commissioner Thompson asked a few clarifying questions about conditional use permits <br />and Administrator Statz explained that conditional uses can have reasonable conditions allowed and <br />planned unit developments are allowed. <br />Commissioner Kalina asked who issues a conditional use permit. Administrator Statz explained that <br />the Planning Commission issues a recommendation to council and council approves it. <br />Commissioner Seppala asked about the Stantec analysis that says the height of the proposed building <br />would be at least 35 feet as defined in the Centerville Zoning Code but would appear 48 feet in height <br />on the north side due to the ground level, on the northwest corner of the buildings. <br />Administrator Statz explained that the Stantec memo has three different options for the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission to consider: one for approval, another one is for approval with enhanced <br />conditions, and one is for denial. Since staff heard a mix of options, they prepared three options. <br />Page 4 of 16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.