Laserfiche WebLink
6/6/23 1746 Dupre Tear down and Approved <br /> Replacement of existing structure <br />reconstruction of existing <br /> Does not alter essential character <br />shed, increasing size by 2 <br />Î shed already present; neighbors <br />feet each side. <br />expressed support <br />9/13/22 7370 Peltier Request for new 8x8 shed in Tabled <br />yard <br />a side <br />7/13/21 1313 Mound Request for 2 car garage on <br />Approved/ <br /> Garage portion approved with <br />Trail spot that previously had 1 Modified/ <br />modified size/height <br />car garage. Denied <br /> Covered patio portion denied <br /> Does not alter essential <br />character of neighborhood - 8 <br />similar structures as precedent; <br />Aligned with neighboring garage; <br />Neighbor support Î No <br />opposition at hearing; Site of <br />previous structure <br />9/1/20 1597 Peltier Concept review to modify Tabled <br />Lake setback for new home build <br />due to shape of lot. <br />Homeowner advised to <br />create official request. <br />rd <br />9/1/20 1837 Î 73 Concept review to use <br />Denied <br />Street existing concrete slab from <br />dog kennel for new shed <br />which didnÓt meet setback <br />requirements <br />9/1/20 1779 Concept review for shed Denied <br />Partridge which wouldnÓt meet <br />Place setbacks due to practical <br />difficulties with backyard <br />water flow <br />8/4/20 1840 Center Concept review for Tabled <br />Street driveway expansion <br />11/12/19, 1687 Sorel Front yard fence to prevent Approved <br /> Issue not present when <br />9/3/19 dogs from entering yard <br />homeowner purchased <br />from City trail and <br />property Î City built public trail <br />endangering homeownerÓs <br />after applicant moved to location <br />dog <br /> Does not alter essential <br />character of the neighborhood <br />Î Other front yard fences on <br />neighboring properties; small <br />variation to fence height; no <br />neighbor opposition <br />7/31/18, 1721 Concept review for fence in Denied <br /> Commission could not grant <br />7/10/18 Heritage the side yard when no rear <br />variance as desired as would be <br />Street yard <br />in opposition to code. <br /> Commission understood plight <br />and expressed interest in <br />g code for future <br />reviewin <br />7/10/18 1965 S. Variance to side yard <br />Approved <br /> Does not alter essential <br />Robin Lane setback for driveway. <br />character of neighborhood Î <br />Garage already approved for <br />No residential neighbors <br />rear of home and request for <br />(adjacent to park). Neighboring <br />minimum width driveway to <br />properties have similar garage <br />access. <br />52 <br /> <br />