Laserfiche WebLink
City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />August 23, 2006 <br />Council Member Lee stated he would like to see the St. Genevieve property remain open <br />space. <br /> <br />4. Centerville Sesquicentennial <br /> <br />Mayor Capra stated they would have their 150 year celebration next year. She asked if <br />the Council wanted to form an ad hoc committee for this celebration and indicated she <br />had some ideas the committee could work on. She stated if there were any citizens or <br />business owners that want to be included on this committee, to email her or the City Hall. <br />She noted there was a two story log house within the blue house located downtown. She <br />indicated the existing home had been built around the log house. She stated she had <br />asked if it would be possible to take apart the house, preserving the log cabin. She stated <br />she was still looking at the possibilities and indicated this log cabin could be one the <br />oldest existing structures in the City. <br /> <br />Council Member Lee stated his only reservation would be the cost of removing the <br />existing home and moving the cabin. <br /> <br />Council Member Terway noted they needed to think about that if it goes, it was gone and <br />there was no chance of finding out if it was significant in terms of historical. He asked <br />the Council to be cautious and make sure there was no historical significance to the log <br />home. <br /> <br /> <br />5.2007 Budget/Levy <br /> <br />Finance Director Meyer stated he had studied what the impact would be to the tax impact <br />on a $309,000 home and the impact would be three percent. <br /> <br />6. Potentially Dangerous Dog – 1742 Ojibway Drive (“Bandit”) <br /> <br />City Attorney Glaser stated they lost jurisdiction once the dog left the community, and if <br />Mr. Roloff remained a citizen within the community, they could work with him, but he <br />understood Mr. Roloff was leaving the community to go to an assisted living care facility. <br />He stated the City did not have to require destroying the dog and there were other <br />alternatives they could look at if the dog came back into the community. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar stated Mr. Roloff had named three incidents where people had <br />been bitten and he believed the dog was dangerous and they had to follow the ordinance. <br /> <br />Council Member Lee stated once there was an issue he believed the dog should be held in <br />quarantine for due process and if the dog was returned to the owner, it should be micro <br />chipped. <br /> <br />Mayor Capra believed the Police should take photographs of the dog, but she did not <br />believe it was necessary to quarantine and hold the dog. She stated she was not opposed <br />to micro chipping, but they needed to follow the due process. <br />Page 8 of 9 <br />