Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />December 13, 2006 <br />Mr. Keleher indicated that they have met C;ode for the new building and they feel that the <br />number of parking stalls for the existing buildings is adequate. <br /> <br />City Attorney Glaser said that it looks like the Developer has agreed to put the City trail <br />easement back into the design. <br /> <br />Mr. Keleher agreed and said that the County design was not done at the time they began <br />this process. He then said that the County has bought 10 feet of additional right of way <br />for a total of 70 feet of right of way along with an additional 15 feet of temporary <br />ease~ent. Mr. Keleher indicated that they feel they could provide the trail easement in <br />the temporary easement after the County is done with it. <br /> <br />City Attorney Glaser asked the Developer to address the park dedication fees. <br /> <br />Mr. Keleher indicated that, according to Ordinance, the fee is $2,175 per acre multiplied <br />by the number of acres is a total of $11,253.45. He then said that they have been making <br />payments and intend to pay the $11,253.45 in total. <br /> <br />Council Member Lee asked how many units there would be. <br /> <br />Mr. Keleher indicated that it is only one building and that is how the dedication fee was <br />calculated. <br /> <br />City Administrator Larson explained that commercial/industrial park dedication fees are <br />calculated on a per acre basis but the City agreed to break it down per unit to make it <br />easier for the Developer. <br /> <br />City Attorney Glaser asked the Developer to address the waiver of screening and <br />drainage requirements. <br /> <br />Mr. Keleher indicated that he does not understand that issue because they have planted <br />out and exceeded the number of trees and provided screening on the west side and along <br />20th Avenue and he reviewed that with Staff. <br /> <br />Mr. Keleher indicated the area on the north end of the parking lot was decided that rather <br />than having an open swale with retaining wall there was approval from the City Engineer <br />to bury a pipe to channel the water and there are trees planted where that swale retaining <br />wall area is and the City public works has a catch basin with a pipe that drains into that <br />pipe to collect water off the City's public works site and the City water tower has a <br />discharge for emergencies into their retention pond. <br /> <br />Mayor Capra indicated that was a concession because part of that berm was on the City's <br />property. <br /> <br />City Attorney Glaser asked the Developer to address the issue of the private <br />improvements that were due to be completed in 2003. <br /> <br />Page 8 of 19 <br /> <br />)1) <br />