Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Parks & Recreation Committee <br />Meeting Minutes December 6, 2006 <br /> <br />continuing on the committee/commission by the first of each year. Each committee member in <br />attendance (Seeley, Amundsen and Merkel) specified they were interested in continuing on the <br />committee. <br /> <br />Ms. Harris is interested in becoming a Parks & Recreation Committee Member and will go through the <br />new process, interviewing with City Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Jeff Hanzal! Hanzal Addition <br /> <br />Mr. Jeff Hanzal made an appearance to discuss his preliminary plat and what ideas the Parks & <br />Recreation Committee have for a trail through this development. The committee had not had an <br />opportunity to discuss this item prior to this meeting. City Administrator Larson explained the idea of <br />potentially purchasing or gaining a trail easement to the back parcel of lots 4 and S (SA) of Peltier <br />Preserve, possibly gaining a trail easement through Mr. Bohen's property (abutting property) and <br />linking a trail from Old Mill Road through the Hanzal Addition to Peltier Lake. Mr. Larson stated that <br />while this may seem ambitious at this time, it has possibilities for the future and now would be the time <br />to map a trail easement through the Hanzal Addition. This might be a destination trail that just goes in <br />to the lake area and back out the same way, without looping to a trail connection, but he encouraged the <br />committee to think big and be patient, gaining access when and where it becomes available. <br /> <br />The committee looked at photos and aerials of the area. Vice-Chairperson Seeley lives in the area and <br />said there are great fluctuations in the water level in the spring and summer and to gain access to some <br />areas it would possibly require a floating bridge. Committee Member Amundsen asked if Mr. Bohen <br />had been contacted about potentially gaining a trail access, to which Mr. Larson replied, not at this <br />time. Mr. Larson acknowledged trail easements can be expensive, depending on whether the <br />landowner believes a trail through their property is a good idea or not. Condemnation proceedings can <br />be used, but that is typically not something a City would like to do for a trail. A trail is typically 10', <br />requiring a 20' easement. Vice-Chairperson Seeley reminded Mr. Hanzal that trails were considered <br />amenities for new home owners and increase property value. Mr. Hanzal said he was fine with the trail <br />as long as the City is working with him from the beginning to locate the easement in the area with the <br />least negative impact on his development. Mr. Hanzal and Mr. Larson agreed that there is some <br />flexibility to slide the development's pond over a little, if needed. Vice-Chairperson Seeley stated that <br />while in theory the idea of a trail through Hanzal's Addition to get to property the City could <br />potentially own on Peltier Lake is a wonderful idea, is the Hanzal Addition trail contingent upon the <br />City acquiring the Peltier Preserve property? Mr. Larson stated no, one is not contingent upon the <br />other, and he just asked the committee to keep an open mind to future possibilities. Mayor Capra said <br />there are many trail easements within the City that do not actually have trails on them at this time. She <br />also added the trail is in addition to Park Dedication Fees, not instead of. <br /> <br />Mayor Capra asked if with the Hanzal Addition curb and gutter will be installed on Old Mill Road. <br />Mr. Larson said curb and gutter would be the City's first choice, but the Rice Creek Watershed District <br />would like to leave it as a non-standard street. Mayor Capra suggested tapering it down to a flatter curb <br />and asked whether the RCWD had any funding available for projects like this involving less paved <br />surfaces? Mr. Larson said that while grants are available for private citizens for items like rain <br />gardens and lake shore restoration, there is typically not funding available for developers. Mr. Hanzal <br />asked exactly what would be his responsibility besides paying per lot Park Dedication Fees. In larger <br />developments such as Pheasant Marsh and Hunters Crossing, the developers were required to install the <br /> <br />3 of 10 <br />