Laserfiche WebLink
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
<br />L,i\.WREl',TCE AND TERI PERRON <br />1798 MAIN STREET <br />CENTERVILLE, MN 55038 <br />651.429.5280 <br /> <br />v!)~ G <br /> <br />~~, j{ : ~/g <br /> <br /> <br />l~~ <br />~. <br /> <br />August 26, 2001 <br /> <br />Reference: Vacating of Mill Road extension south of Main Street <br /> <br />City of Centerville <br />1880 Main Street <br />Centervi1le, 1'vlli :55038 <br /> <br />..,:.y c:r'( <br />\~1 ~ :2~>t <br /> <br />r~j <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />l, <br /> <br />To Whom It May Concem: <br /> <br />Since 1979, we have owned the two adjacent pieces of property that once included the land now <br />know as the extension to Mill Road. The pieces together formed Peterson's Addition to <br />Centerville #2. I have been infonned by the City of Centerville that this land could be vacated and <br />retumed to the private community. <br /> <br />From what [ have been able to find out through city and county resources, when Peterson's <br />Addition #2 was fanned, land was given to the City of Centerville for the future purpose of <br />building a road south across Clear Water Creek. Tnat reason no longer exits because of the way <br />the development and roads were built south of Clear Water Creek. Also, the vacation of that land <br />should be to where fhe land first came from- Peterson's Addition #2- which we own. <br /> <br />Because the City of Centerville has never considered this a true road, the expense of <br />maintenance, snow removal, etc.; have been done at my expense. I did not consider this a major <br />problem for many years because it was the only way to get to my garage and the land east of'i\/llll <br />Road (lot #13 of Peterson's Addition #1) was considered non-buildable land by the City of <br />Centerv'ille (less than 100 ft frontage). Since the mid 90' s, Mill Road extension has been a <br />constant irritation and point of dispute. <br /> <br />In the mid 90's, fonner owner o[Peterson's Addition #1, lot #13 (Lee Stevens) sta.l1ed trying to <br />sell his property. I approached him, but could 110t come to an agreement because of the status of <br />buildable VS. non-buildable property. There were several city meetings. The City of CenterviIle <br />eventually grmlted the right to build due to the fact that Peterson's Addition #1 had 50 ft. frontage <br />laws. The land was now considered buildable land, but did not meet setback regulations for a <br />comer lot. This meant the land was more expensive, the City of Centenrille could get more tax <br />money, but you couldn't put a house on it. Needless to say, the land did not sell. <br /> <br />Lee Stevens again petirioned the City of Centerville. I-lis point was simple, if the land was <br />considered buildable because it was part of Peterson's Addition #1 andMiH Road extension was <br />not given to the City of Centervi11e until after Peterson's Addition #2 was fonned, tJ.'1e setback <br />requirements should not apply. There were several more city meeting, but the City of Centerville <br />eventually granted a variance so a house could be built. Lee Stevens could not sell the property <br />~l1d decided to build bis own house. But the problems did not stop there. <br />