My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-11-28 CC
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2001
>
2001-11-28 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2007 3:47:28 PM
Creation date
1/3/2007 3:46:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />4. Comprehensive Sign Plan - Uptown Center <br /> <br />Ms. Katie Newman told the Committee she was told by Mr. Drilling that she would need <br />to seek approval for deviation from the sign plan approved by the City. She then <br />explained the type of sign she wished to use. <br /> <br />Connnissioner DeVine indicated that Mr. Drilling is only allowed a certain number of <br />square feet for signage and said the City has not seen a sign plan for the building. <br /> <br />The Committee clarified that Ms. Newman would need to speak to Mr. Drilling <br />concerning approval of her sign. The Committee also told Ms. Newman that Mr. Drilling <br />needed to come to the City with a comprehensive sign plan for approval. <br /> <br />5. Vacating Mill Road Extension South of Main Street (Mr. and Mrs. Perron. 1798 <br />Main Street and Mr. Clay Alcock. 1806 Main Street) <br /> <br />Commissioner De Vine indicated he did not see a reason that Mill Road would go south. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wilharber explained that the City planned for the roadway based on the <br />County wanting roads to be across from each other. He then indicated that Eagle Pass is <br />located where the tree fann used to be and it appears that Mill Road will not be going <br />south. He further indicated that, if the City vacates the roadway, the property would be <br />split evenly to each ofthe property owners' as was platted at the time. <br /> <br />Mr. Palzer indicated that state statute dictates how the property will be split up and that <br />will be based on how it was platted at the time. He further indicated that both parties <br />have expressed an interest in proceeding with the vacation of the roadway. <br />Commissioner Wilharber noted the residents would be paying for the costs to vacate the <br />roadway. <br /> <br />Motion bv Commissionell" DeVine. seconded by Commissioner Wilharber to <br />recommend to Council that the Catv move forward with the vacation of the Mill <br />Road Extension. AU in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />6. Lot Split -NIT. and Mrs. David West from Mr. Alcock (180 Main Street) <br /> <br />Mr. West explained there is a signed purchase agreement for the land but said the County <br />is requiring City approval of the lot split before the documents can be recorded with the <br />County. <br /> <br />Motion bv Comm2~sioneJl" Wilhall"ber. se~onded bv Commissioner DeVine to <br />recommend to Council approval oCtile lot split as requested in the letter from Mr. <br />West dated September 25,2001. AU in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Page 12 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.