My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-10-17 CC
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2025
>
2001
>
2001-10-17 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2007 9:19:32 AM
Creation date
1/19/2007 8:32:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members <br /> <br />FROM: Teresa Bender, Clerk/Treasurer <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Mr. Nottum, 7238 Main Street <br /> <br />DATE: October 5, 2001 <br /> <br />Both Kris and myself have been working with Mr. Nottum regarding his utility account <br />(sewer). Mr. Nottum is questioning why he is being charged for two (2) sewer <br />connections and has been for many years. Through numerous discussions with Mr. <br />Nottum and research of City records, we have ascertained that Mr. Nottum in 1984 was <br />being billed for one (1) sewer connection unit at $27 per quarter and in 1986 $41 per <br />quarter. City records are missing from Mr. Nottum's address folder regarding utility <br />billing for the period of 3rd quarter 1986 through 1995 4th quarter billing. City records <br />show that in 1996 Mr. Nottum was being billed $80 per quarter equating to two (2) sewer <br />connections. Mr. Nottum has stated that his residence is a duplex and he rent same off <br />and on. Mr. Nottum as stated that previously he owned two (2) lots, both having sewer <br />connections. Mr. Nottum has stated that his brother purchased the additional lot and has <br />been billed for sewer accordingly. Mr. Nottum stated that he has contacted City Hall <br />regarding this on numerous occasions and was told that he owned a duplex and that was <br />the reasoning behind the billing oftwo (2) units. <br /> <br />Mr. Nottum is requesting that this item be researched further and a refund issued if it is <br />determined to be in error. <br /> <br />Attached, you will find Ordinance #30 in regards to Residential Equivalent Charges <br />Unites) and billing for same. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.