Laserfiche WebLink
<br />LAWRENCE AND TERI PERRON <br />1798 MAIN STREET <br />CENTERVILLE, MN 55038 <br />651.429.5280 <br />..j ~ <-1 - " <br />:,f/'0/ >e (;;, '7 (, t &' '7 . <br /> <br />Cj /) "-,it., <br />(v ; ~ <br /> <br />August 26, 2001 <br /> <br />Reference: Vacating of Mill Road extension south ofMatn Street <br /> <br />City of Centerville <br />1880 Main Street <br />Centerville, IvlN 55038 <br /> <br />To Whom It May Concern: <br /> <br />Since 1979, we have owned the two adjacent pieces of property that once included the land now <br />know as the extension to Mill Road. The pieces together formed Peterson's Addition to <br />Centerville #2. I have been informed by the City ofCenterville that this land could be vacated and <br />returned to the private community. <br /> <br />From what I have been able to find out through city and county resources, when Peterson's <br />Addition #2 was fonned, land was given to the City of Centerville for the future purpose of <br />building a road south across Clear Water Creek. That reason no longer exits because of the way <br />the development and roads were built south of Clear Water Creek. Also, the vacation of that land <br />should be to where the land first came from- Peterson's Addition #2- which we own. <br /> <br />Because the City of Centerville has never considered this a true road, the expense of <br />maintenance, snow removal, etc.; have been done at my expense. I did not consider this a major <br />problem for many years because it was the only way to get to my garage and the land east of Mill <br />Road (1ot #13 of Peterson's Addition #1) was considered non-buildable land by the City of <br />Centerville (less than 100 ft frontage). Since the mid 90's, Mill Road extension has been a <br />constant irritation and point of dispute. <br /> <br />fn the mid 90's, former owner of Peterson's Addition #1, lot #13 (Lee Stevens) started trying to <br />sell his property. I approached him, but could not come to an agreement because of the status of <br />buildable vs. non-buildable property. There were several city meetings. The City of Centerville <br />eventually granted the right to build due to the fact that Peterson's Addition #1 had 50 ft. frontage <br />laws. The land was now considered buildable land, but did not meet setback regulations for a <br />comer lot. This meant the land was more expensive, the City of CentervilIe could get more tax <br />money, but you couldn't put a house on it. Needless to say, the land did not sell. <br /> <br />Lee Stevens again petitioned the City ofCenterville. His point was simple, if the land was <br />considered buildable because it was part of Peterson's Addition #1 and Mill Road extension was <br />not given to the City of Centerville until after Peterson's Addition #2 was formed, the setback <br />requirements should not apply. There were several more city meeting, but the City of Centerville <br />eventually granted a variance so a house could be built. Lee Stevens could not sell the property <br />and decided to build his own house. But the problems did not stop there. <br />