My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-12-05 P & Z
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2000-2022
>
2006
>
2006-12-05 P & Z
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2007 8:35:44 AM
Creation date
2/2/2007 8:35:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF CENTERVILLE <br />PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION <br />December 5, 2006 <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission held their regularly <br />scheduled meeting on December 5, 2006, at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />PRESENT: <br />Chairperson Brian Hanson <br /> Commissioner Jennefer Klennert Hunt (arrived at 6:40 p.m.) <br /> Commissioner Bob Wright <br /> Commissioner Mark Pangell <br /> Commissioner D. Love <br /> <br />ABSENT: <br />Commissioner Tom Wood <br /> <br />COUNCIL: <br />Mayor Mary Capra <br /> <br />STAFF: <br /> Dallas Larson <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />I. CALL TO ORDER <br /> <br /> <br />1.Roll Call <br /> <br />The meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />II. APPEARANCES <br /> <br /> 1. Ms. Norma Essex – 7333 Old Mill Road (Fence Ordinance) <br /> <br />Ms. Essex stated that she would like the fencing ordinance to be reviewed, not only for <br />her benefit but for the benefit of others. She stated that the current fence ordinance states <br />that fencing needs to have a two-foot setback, which means you, would lose two feet of <br />your yard. She stated that, in her case, this would mean her underground sprinkler <br />system would be on the opposite side of the fence. She stated that she would like to <br />install a split rail fence directly on the property line, without permission from the <br />neighbor due to re-occurring difficulties with that same neighbor. Ms. Essex stated that <br />she does not understand the need for the two foot setback because there is no ordinance <br />for setback distances on trees or brush plants. She stated that if she cannot install a fence <br />on her property line, she would like to put in a hedge. <br /> <br />Chair Hanson stated that the reason for the two foot setback is to allow for maintenance <br />on both sides of the fence and still remain on your own property. He stated that there are <br />allowable reasons for a zero lot line in some cases; however, a property survey will need <br />Page 1 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.