My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-12-13 CC
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
2006-12-13 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2007 11:43:12 AM
Creation date
2/2/2007 11:43:04 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />City of Centerville <br /> Council Meeting Minutes <br /> December 13, 2006 <br /> <br />Mr. Keleher indicated that they were given an extension to do the development on the <br />site. He then said that the landscaping fee was associated with that and revolved around <br />the buildings that were not built and the sod in the common areas has been done in the <br />developed area. He further explained that they do not have the second lift of blacktop on <br />the parking lot and the retaining wall was not done in favor of the pipe and landscaping <br />and the lighting is not up. <br /> <br />Mr. Keleher indicated that the trash enclosure is done as are utilities, sewer, and water <br />and they paid the storm water fee. <br /> <br />Mr. Keleher indicated that he wrote a letter to Mr. Larson and then provided copies to <br />Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Keleher indicated that they would like to have a work session discussion to work on <br />the colors and style of the building. He then said that they want to work with the City <br />and feel that the client would be good for this community by bringing 70 jobs into town <br />and they would be a good neighbor. He further said that the neighboring property owners <br />were invited to their offices to discuss the plan and were contacted by the City for the <br />public hearing. <br /> <br />Mr. Keleher indicated that they began this process on September 20, 2006 and have been <br />going through this process as requested. <br /> <br />City Attorney Glaser recommended holding off on approval of the CUP until the plans <br />are further revised. He then suggested that the Development Agreement was not <br />followed through to the letter and some things are late and the suggestion from Planning <br />and Zoning was to issue approval that states the Developer would execute a Development <br />Agreement to the satisfaction of the City. <br /> <br />City Attorney Glaser indicated that the Developer should resolve some outstanding issues <br />from the existing Development Agreement. He then said that tabling approval will give <br />Staff time to have the items written out line by line along with time for consideration of <br />changes to the building. <br /> <br />Mayor Capra thanked the Developer for the samples they brought and said that it helped <br />to understand what the color would be. She then said that she would be open to a work <br />session to discuss the building style and color. <br /> <br />City Engineer Statz said that with having the nine (9) buildings there is justification for <br />the claim that there can be shared parking but that justification goes away when the <br />number of buildings is reduced to three. He then said that Council should consider that <br />future uses in the buildings may change and those uses may have different parking <br />requirements. <br /> <br />Page 9 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.