My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-06-27 CC
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2001
>
2001-06-27 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2007 8:58:00 AM
Creation date
2/8/2007 8:57:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Meeting Minutes <br />June 13,2001 <br /> <br />Motion by Mayor Swedberg. seconded by Council Member Capra to open the <br />public hearing. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Mayor Swedberg opened the public hearing at 7:42 p.m. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson gave a brief overview of the proposed development and indicated that there <br />would be seventy-seven (77) residential lots constructed in three phases. He then <br />indicated that the improvements for sewer and water would run along the east side of <br />Centerville Road. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson noted the draft report for assessments was meant to generate discussion and <br />the assessments were based on front footage. He then noted there are three (3) properties <br />to be assessed. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson indicated that the two (2) exception properties to the north would not be <br />assessed as Ground Development had agreed to stub the water lines to the property line. <br /> <br />Terry Hannah, Ground Development, indicated he was not sure if there needed to be an <br />assessment or not as the agreement with the two (2) property owners was to bring water <br />to the curb in front of their houses. Mr. Peterson indicated there would not be a need for <br />an assessment for those two (2) properties. <br /> <br />Coun{;il Member Nelson indicated that the previous assessment for Mr. Wilharber totaled <br />$45,653 and was reduced to $22,826, which is half of the original assessment. She then <br />noted that the Dide assessment was approximately $1,638, more than half. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson indicated there was a charge to run the pipe from the center to the edge of <br />the road. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson explained the formula he used to arrive at the assessments for the Dide <br />residence and noted that typically both sides of the street would be assessed but indicated <br />there is no one to assess for the other side in this situation. He then indicated the <br />remainder of the assessment falls to Mr. Wilharber and Ground Development with the <br />majority going to Ground Development. He further noted that Mr. Vanderbeek could not <br />be assessed again and noted he had added that cost to Ground Development. <br /> <br />Mayor Swedberg indicated that no matter which formula is used, the estimate to the City <br />is $37,000 and noted there are really four (4) entities paying for the improvements, the <br />City, Ground Development, Wilharber and Dide. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson indicated that Mr. Vanderbeek was assessed more than any of the three (3) <br />options on his property last year because that is the way the numbers worked out for that <br />assessment. <br /> <br />Page 2 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.