My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-04-11 CC
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2001
>
2001-04-11 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2007 9:28:56 AM
Creation date
2/8/2007 9:28:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />· The MOU further states in Section 1 (0) that the Member Cities and <br />Commission agree that the PEG Fee, the $300,000 capital funding and <br />the transfer of PEG programming operations "are made for, and in full <br />satisfaction of PEG and any related programming obligations upon <br /> <br />m_~__~__renewal . .-._." ....n_n_~_~__. ...~__m__~~ n_~~___mm_~__~_~ _ __n___.____~_ <br /> <br />The text of the MOU, and the fact that it occurred while the parties were <br />negotiating the renewal of the franchise, make very plain the fact that the parties <br />have already reached closure on the PEG and any related programming <br />obligations for purposes of the renewal. <br /> <br />The clause in the MOU which states that the Company's commitments to <br />collect the PEG Fee, to make the capital grants in 1996 and 1997, and to transfer <br />PEG programming facilities to the Commission constitute the entire PEG support <br />for the renewal is a fundamental component of the agreement. If the <br />Commission believes that this provision is no longer valid, then it is repudiating <br />the entire agreement. This would be particularly troubling in light of the <br />substantial expenditures under the MOU that have been incurred by the <br />Company to date. The Company cannot accept a unilateral change to a <br />fundamental component of the MOU. If the Commission wishes to discuss an <br />amendment of the MOU, then all aspects of the MOU must be included, including <br />deletion of the requirement for Universal service and a reduction of the PEG Fee <br />to eliminate operational support, which, but for the MOU agreement, must be <br />paid out of franchise fees in a renewed franchise. <br /> <br />It is the Company's position that the PEG support provisions of the <br />renewal have already been resolved by the MOU. The Company has honored <br />and will continue to stand by the terms of that agreement. Your letter states that <br />the Commission's offer would be considered withdrawn if not accepted by 4:00 <br />p.m. on March 19, 2001. We think that such an ultimatum is regrettable, but <br />since the Commission seeks an increase to the PEG Fee and nearly $350,000 in <br />PEG grants in addition to the PEG provisions of the MOU, we cannot agree to <br />the Commission's proposal. <br /> <br />As the Commission has withdrawn its offers effective 4:00 p.m. today, the <br />Company must also withdraw all offers beyond the terms of the MOU which we <br />have previously made toward negotiating a franchise renewal. As we see the <br />current situation, we still have the MOU, which resolves a large portion of the <br />renewal. We are ready to sit down with the Commission again to take a fresh <br />effort to negotiate the terms of a franchise renewal. However, by this response <br />we are not waiving any rights under applicable law, we continue to reserve all <br />rights under the Standstill Agreement to Pursue Informal Renewal Procedures <br />dated November 15, 1995, and we expressly reserve all other rights with respect <br />to renewal under applicable law. <br /> <br />P.3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.