My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-02-28 CC
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2001
>
2001-02-28 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2007 10:40:32 AM
Creation date
2/8/2007 10:39:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />development capability as well as specific capability in the type and size of development proposed. <br /> <br />I. The developer should retain ownership of the project at least long enough to complete it, to stabilize <br />its occupancy, to establish the project management, and to initiate repayment of the TIP. <br /> <br />1. The level of TIF funding should be reduced to the lowest possible level by maximizing the use of <br />private debt and equity financing first, and then using other funding sources or income producing <br />vehicles that can be structured into the project financing, prior to using additional TIP funding. <br /> <br />5. TAX INCREMENT PROJECT EV ALVA TION CRITERIA <br /> <br />5.01 All projects will be evaluated on the following criteria for comparison with other proposed TIP projects <br />reviewed by the City, and for comparison with other subsidy standards (where appropriate). It is realized <br />that changes in local markets, costs of construction, and interest rates may cause changes in the amounts <br />of Tax Increment subsidies that a given project may require at any given time. <br /> <br />5.02 Some criteria, by their very nature, must remain subjective. However, wherever possible "benchmark" <br />criteria have been established for review purposes. The fact that a given proposal meets one or more <br />"benchmark" criteria does not mean that it is entitled to funding under this policy, but rather that the City <br />is in a position to proceed with evaluations of (and comparisons between) various TIF proposals, using <br />uniform standards whenever possible. <br /> <br />5.03 Following are the evaluation criteria that will be used by the City ofCenterville <br /> <br />A. All TIF proposals should optimize the private development potential of a site. <br /> <br />B. All TIP proposals should obtain the highest possible private to public fmancial investment ratio. The <br />Council establishes a benchmark ratio of 3 parts private to I part public funding for industrial <br />projects. Rousing and retail/commercial projects shall be reviewed on an individual basis. <br /> <br />C. All TIP proposals should create the highest feasible number of new jobs on the site. The Council <br />establishes a benchmark of one newly created (or retained) FTE job per $ of TIP assistance <br />provided to industrial projects. Housing and Retail/Commercial projects shall be reviewed on an <br />individual basis. <br /> <br />D. All TIF proposals should create the highest possible ratio of property taxes paid before and after <br />redevelopment Given the different assessment circumstances in the City, this ratio will vary widely. <br />However, under normal circumstances, the Council will expect at least a 1:2 ratio of taxes paid <br />before and after redevelopment. <br /> <br />E. TIF proposals should normally not be used to support speculative industrial, commercial, and office <br />projects. In general, speculative projects are defined as those projects which have letters of intent <br />or preleasing for less than 50% of the available leasable space. <br /> <br />F. All TIF proposals will be reviewed to determine the feasibility to provide the City with equity <br />participation in new developments (through a share of the profits), or to treat the TIP assistance as <br />a second mortgage with fixed payments. <br /> <br />G. All TIF proposals involving displacement oflow and moderate income residents should give specific <br />attention to the re-housing needs of those residents. Normally, this should be done as a part of the <br />TIF funding proposal. Adequate solutions to these re-housing needs will be required as a matter of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.