Laserfiche WebLink
<br />new subdivisions were provided with silt fences. He suggested several options for <br />quicker, cleaner drainage for future developments for the Council to discuss. Mr. <br />March stated a curb cut option could also be discussed for the City of Centerville to <br />allow for smoother lines from the street to the driveway. <br /> <br />Mr. March asked if the Council would be in favor of considering this grinding option. <br />Mr. Peterson noted the surmountable curb could be improved with the stand up curb <br />with the mud run off. <br /> <br />Council Member Travis stated he was in favor of this, but noted the grinder used for <br />the driveways could be a problem not always providing a smooth cut. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned whether a Developer could be stopped <br />or not used for future developments if City specifications were not being met. Mr. <br />March noted time lines are going to be set from now on and stated he could not stop <br />them from developing. He indicated Developers would be held to City Code. <br /> <br />Mr. March noted the City was responsible for cleaning the catch basins within <br />developments and noted the Public Works Department would need to keep up with <br />this in the future. <br /> <br />Council Member Sweeney noted the Parkview Trail placement within the <br />development and stated that it was placed without base as recommended by the City. <br />Mr. Palzer stated the Parkview Trail was damaged by an unidentified vehicle, but it <br />does have a six-inch base with two inches of asphalt. He noted this was acceptable to <br />City Trail Standards. <br /> <br />Council Member Sweeney indicated he would like to have a City Wide Specification <br />made for all new trails. Council Member Nelson concurred and asked that the City <br />Engineer draft language for setting these specifications. Mr. Palzer indicated the City <br />does have specifications at this time and noted these specifications have been used for <br />Hunter's Crossing. <br /> <br />Mayor Wilharber asked that the City Engineer review this issue and report back to the <br />Council at the next meeting. <br /> <br />VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br /> <br />Hunter's Crossing Ditch - Tabled July 26, 2000 <br /> <br />Mayor Wilharber asked for a review of this issue. Mr. Hoeft noted he had not heard <br />from the Title Company, but noted Mr. March received a letter on August 8, 2000, <br />regarding the quick claim deeds for Hunter's Crossing. He stated he would contact the <br />Title Company and report back to the Council at their next meeting. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Nelson to <br />table the Hunter's Crossing Ditch discussion to the August 23. 2000 meeting. All <br />in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />7 <br />