Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />What's an Abatement and Why Does Everybody Want One? <br /> <br />Local governments in Minnesota have had to deal with <br />abatements for many years. Under the traditional meaning <br />of this term, an abatement occurs when a property owner <br />successfully appeals for a reduction in the estimated market <br />value used for tax purposes on their property. This leads to a <br />reduction in the taxes due on the property, often for several <br />years. Over the past three years, a new meaning of abatement <br />has emerged. State law now allows local governments to <br />voluntarily grant "abatements" as an economic development <br />incentive. <br /> <br />A New Concept <br />The law authorizing this new form of abatements (Minnesota <br />Statutes, Sections 469.1812 to 469.1815) was first adopted in <br />1997 and has been amended each year since. This law grew out <br />of concerns by legislators about some aspects of Tax Increment <br />Financing (TIF) , the most commonly used economic <br />development tool in Minnesota. Concerns included: the lack of <br />control that counties and school districts had over TIF, the cost <br />to the state (through additional school aids) ofTIF, and the <br />complexities of and restrictions associated with TIE <br /> <br />The term "abatement" is somewhat of a misnomer in terms of <br />how the new law works. Taxes are not reduced, as in the <br />traditional meaning of abatements. For the typical abatement, <br />the owner of the property pays property taxes in the same <br />manner and amount as if there were no abatement. However, <br />all or a part of the property taxes collected on the property may <br />be paid back to the owner or diverted for another use, as <br />determined by the abatement agreement(s). The abatement <br />statutes also allow for the deferral of taxes. <br /> <br />TIF V5. Abatement <br /> <br />Abatements are often presented as an alternative to TIF as a <br />tool for economic development. There are several key <br />differences: <br /> <br />. Approving Entities. TIF districts may be created by cities <br />and various forms of development authorities or agencies. <br />School districts and counties (without an HRA or EDA) , <br />however, have no authority to create TIF districts or to <br />prevent their creation, even though creation of a TIF <br />district will affect school district and county taxes. With <br />abatements, each taxing jurisdiction (school district, <br />county, city or township) must individually approve the <br />abatement of their portion of property taxes. <br /> <br />· Required Findings. Before creating a TIF district, a <br />municipality must recognize a variety of "findings" including <br />the famous "but for" test (that the development would not <br /> <br />occur but for tax increment assistance). The findings <br />required to grant an abatement are generally less complex <br />and restrictive. In some cases, an abatement may fall <br />within the definition of a "business subsidy" under state law. <br />In these cases, the use of tax abatement may also require <br />the adoption of "criteria" for granting business subsidies and <br />the adoption of a business subsidy agreement with the <br />recipient of the assistance. <br /> <br />. Approval Process. The process of documenting and <br />approving an abatement agreement is generally less <br />cumbersome and detailed than the process for a TIF <br />district. The catch is that, in order to receive an abatement <br />of substantially all property taxes, three government entities <br />must approve separate abatement agreements. A public <br />hearing must be held prior to approving the abatement. <br /> <br />. Uses of Proceeds. While tax increment proceeds are <br />subject to numerous restrictions on use, there are no <br />restrictions on how or where abatement proceeds are used. <br /> <br />. Time Limits. The time limits on the use of TIF vary <br />according to the type of TIF district. If one of the political <br />subdivisions declines to abate taxes, then the abatement <br />may occur for up to 15 years. Otherwise, the maximum <br />time limit is 10 years. <br /> <br />. Amount of Abatement. The revenue from abatement <br />differs from TIF in two important ways. (1) Tax increment <br />comes from the value of new development, while Tax <br />abatement may apply to both new and existing value. <br />(2)There is no financial limit on a city's total tax <br />increment. On the other hand, the total amount of <br />abatement in any year for each jurisdiction is capped at the <br />greater of 5% of the current levy or $100,000. <br /> <br />. Bonds. Both TIF and abatement statutes authorize the <br />issuance of general obligation bonds without an election <br />and which are not subject to the debt limit. The maximum <br />principal for abatement bonds cannot exceed the estimated <br />sum of the abatements. For TIF bonds, not less than 20% <br />of the debt service must be paid by tax increments. <br /> <br />. Reporting Requirements. For TIF districts, the granting <br />authority must submit detailed annual reports to the Office <br />of the State Auditor. There are no required annual reports <br />on abatements. <br /> <br />· School District Taxes. Neither TIF nor an abatement will <br />affect a school district's total revenue. However, most of <br />the tax revenue that a school district "loses" to a TIF <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />.. <br />