Laserfiche WebLink
<br />., <br /> <br />I realize the timing of me suggesting this altsmati\le is not the ~reate$t for you w:th the <br />coundl meeting set for next Wednesday. I would be willing to look at something \....here we <br />could reduce the. arr.ount of paperwork that needed :0 be changed, but looked at my i'roposal <br />es some:hing that could be ~nished at a leter date. eS5:.Jming there was a f:avorable reCictlon <br />to the proposal. <br /> <br />A few othtr thir,gs we have discussed but I would like to get down in writing: <br /> <br />. , feel the wording of the new docul'r'ent$ suggests t/",8t the 1-year abatement is being <br />provided to induce Northam Forest Pioducts to exp;nCl. AS we have discussed, this <br />needs to somehow be changed to make it va:y clear that there: are no strings attached <br />. I need to have a $chedule prep~red by Ehiers with t.l'le current stat.ls of the notes once <br />we have resolved our issl./es. This must be accurate, and should at least have a good <br />"starting pain:" as of 9/15/00 documented and made part o~ the new agreement. I realize <br />the schecu!e may change in the Mure but we need to establish what ttle balance is a: <br />the start 0" any new agreement. 1 cl.:r;,ently have about 15 different Ehlers schedules and <br />they arl!; ail different. <br /> <br />Please call me to review this letter at your convenienoe. <br /> <br /> <br />Paul McDowel! <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />~oo WI <br /> <br />Sl)naD~d ~Sg~Od NM~O~ <br /> <br />1:686 an Hfl IVd tz: 1'1 (}3,1i 00/90/60 <br />