My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-09-27 CC
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2000
>
2000-09-27 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2007 12:28:18 PM
Creation date
2/8/2007 12:27:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />A member of the audience, also from the Association, indicated cars are speeding <br />through the development. They indicated this was not safe because there are <br />pedestrians in the street because the sidewalks contain construction debris and <br />dirt. <br /> <br />Mr. March asked if the developer could be forced to pay for additional <br />streetlights. Mr. Hoeft stated the City would have to discuss this with the <br />developer subsequent to finding out if they are in violation of the Development <br />Agreement. <br /> <br />Mr. March indicated Swift Construction is interested in developing the outlots and <br />stated they have complied with City requests regarding those outlots. <br /> <br />Mr. March said he received a telephone call from Swift regarding the Townhome <br />Association and indicated they are looking into stainless steel mailboxes and <br />asked if the City would be willing to waive the $25.00 per mailbox stand fee if the <br />developer installs them. He also requested the Association intended to replace all <br />mailbox stands or just to install this type for new units. <br /> <br />Mr. Halstrom said the Association does not like the appearance of the current <br />mailbox stand and indicated it is not secure. Recently, mail was removed from a <br />box and placed in the park's portable toilet. <br /> <br />A member of the audience, also from the Association, explained the mailbox <br />stands are unsightly and difficult to install additional mailbox to the existing <br />stands. <br /> <br />Mr. March stated Public Works will address the issue of the mailbox add ons and <br />stated that Swift is unwilling want to pay the $25.00 on top of the $21.00 they are <br />being charged for the mailbox holders. <br /> <br />A member of the audience, from the Association, said they were told the post <br />office would pay $20.50 for each undeveloped lot for a secure mailbox unit but <br />the developer needed to provide the concrete pad. <br /> <br />1\ ,f~,,~~ ur;l1,~~l..~~ ~~1.~,.l :r .l..~ _,~:1 ~..~",. .,,~~ reported to th~ pOl;~, t...~~~"s~ <br />H'iU)VJ. ... .ll1.h..UU\""-l (..l,:}l\..\",..U 11 Ul\..t' lULL!! .l-llU..lU,\.. VVu.;) \",.- tH..\... u"",,,,,,au \,... <br />tampering with mail is a federal offense. <br /> <br />A member of the audience, from the Association, asked if a building permit was <br />required for the concrete pads. Mr. March indicated a permit was not required. <br /> <br />Mayor Wilharber questioned the Council if they had any issues or discussion <br />concerning the matter. <br /> <br />Page 7 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.