Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mayor Wilharber indicated he drove through the City at night and found that <br />buildings and homes with lights on the exterior do provide more light on the street <br />and said having lights on the townhome exteriors may be an idea to solve the <br />problem. He also indicated the City would be willing to look at the lighting issue <br />but said he is concerned for continued operating costs. <br /> <br />Mr. March noted with the development of the outlot areas the City would have <br />leverage to assess the developer for more lights. <br /> <br />A member of the audience, who is a member of the Association, said when they <br />drive around the curves in the development their headlights go one way and they <br />are looking the other way into the dark. She said she has almost hit people <br />because people are walking in the street because the sidewalks are not clear. She <br />also indicated a desire for a security light at the park and said she believes the <br />light at the park should be the City's responsibility. Mr. March noted people in <br />this community are out alot walking and biking and even though there are <br />sidewalks provided alot of people do walk in the streets. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated a desire to have the ongoing clean- <br />up of construction debris added to the Development Agreement. She said a silt <br />fencing requirement has been added already and indicated the sodding or soil <br />replacement should be inspected and if done incorrectly, it should be re-done at <br />the developer's expense. She also said the issues of Eagle Park need to be <br />forwarded to the Parks and Recreation Department. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers then asked if the developer can force the <br />Association to take on new members by developing the outlots. Mr. Hoeft <br />declined to comment as he has not read the Development Agreement. <br /> <br />Mr. Halstrom explained the by-laws of the Association say the developer can add <br />up to sixty-seven (67) units. He explained the private road will expand and add <br />eight (8) more units than allowed in the by-laws. The current plan from Swift <br />Construction shows twenty (20) units and the by-laws state eighteen (18) are <br />allowed. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if the developer came to the Council <br />with a plan for a certain number of houses if the City could deny the request if the <br />Association provides the Council with something that proves the developer is at <br />fault. She then indicated if the Association has nothing to prevent the <br />development it may be a civil issue between the developer and the Association. <br />City Attorney Hoeft stated he could not comment on the developer's plans <br />because there is not an approved plan. He then indicated the developer could <br />create a new association or create some thing with the existing Association if it is <br />not in violation of the by-laws or Development Agreement. He indicated the plan <br /> <br />Page 9 of 22 <br />