Laserfiche WebLink
<br />than use simulcast technology, however, that will require dispatch center operators to <br />continuously be switching between radio sites depending on where a unit is located in the <br />geographic area of Anoka County when communications with that unit is required. Especially <br />during busy periods, when dispatchers are occupied with remembering and dealing with large <br />amounts of data and large amounts of units, it must be expected that there will be frequent errors <br />in selecting the best radio transmitter site. In addition, the dispatch radio operators cannot <br />always know what is the best transmitter site because radio coverage is highly dependent upon <br />terrain and a unit may actually be able to communicate better with a site further away rather than <br />a closer site ifthere is some intervening terrain between the unit and the closer site. For this <br />reason, it is strongly recommended that if the existing systems are to be enhanced, then <br />additional radio channels obtained through the ref arming process and additional radio sites with <br />simulcast transmission should be the minimum changes implemented. If that is accomplished, <br />then "Coverage" scoring would be a "I". All of the other parameters, except "Smart System <br />Benefits," would be a "2" and the "Smart System Benefits" would continue to be a "5" since <br />those benefits are only gained through use oftrunking technology. The cost estimate figures in <br />Section III of this report reflect the enhancements recommended. <br /> <br />There are two complete replacement options that are available in the system replacement <br />alternative direction. They are, use of the Mn/DOT 800 MHz trunked radio system or use of <br />stand-alone 800 MHz trunked radio system. <br /> <br />As can be seen from the evaluation form, the two 800 MHz trunked radio system alternatives are <br />considered to provide excellent performance in all of the parameter areas with the exception that <br />it will be somewhat easier for the public to monitor an analog radio system than one that uses <br />digital modulation. As a result of this evaluation, it is concluded that one of the 800 MHz <br />trunked radio systems will provide the very best performing radio system for use by public safety <br />entities within Anoka County. In addition, use oftrunked radio technology is likely to be a long- <br />term solution to the needs of public safety entities in Anoka County while use ofthe existing <br />radio frequencies will most likely become unacceptable in some period of time, probably less <br />than ten years, due to the increasing needs, especially for more radio channels and more <br />functionality, as the population of the County continues to grow and the degree of urbanization <br />increases. It is probable that even with splitting channels through using the refarming option that <br />it will not be possible to provide the increases in radio frequencies that probably will be required <br />in less than ten years. At that time, Anoka County may be forced to abandon its investment in <br />any enhancement of existing radio systems, if that direction is chosen, in order to migrate to an <br />800 MHz trunked radio option. That would likely occur before the end of the useful life of <br />equipment that might be purchased within the next few years if the enhancement of existing <br />systems option is selected. <br /> <br />All of the major U.S. based radio manufacturers are currently developing new hardware and new <br />software options using the end-to-end digital technology that includes digital modulation in the <br />form that is included in the Mn/DOT 800 MHz trunked radio system. This technology is using <br />the Internet Protocol (IP) addressing and is essentially a wide-area digital communications <br /> <br />Ronald Vegemast Engineering, Inc. <br /> <br />-36- <br /> <br />Report: Anoka County <br />