Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of the Meeting of June 24, 1999 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Schedule of Bills Paid <br /> <br />(AI 10.1) <br /> <br />Councilmember Clark requested clarification of a check written to the Blaine's Blazin 4th Celebration. He <br />asked if an appropriate organization had been determined. <br /> <br />The City Manager stated he would check into this item and report back. <br /> <br />Resolution No. 99-174, Accept Bid for Zumbrota Street NE from 89th Lane NE to 90th Lane NE, <br />Improvement Project No. 94-06E Non-Spine; Edison Street NE from 85th Avenue NE to 87th Avenue NE <br />Alignment, Improvement Project No. 94-06J; 93rd Lane NE and Dunkirk Street NE in the Plat of S1. Clair <br />Park 2nd Addition, Improvement Project No. 98-21 <br /> <br />Council member Daniels expressed concern about awarding a bid to a contractor that the City was not <br />satisfied with on a previous project due to the lack of management. She asked if the City was required by <br />law to accept the low bid. The City Engineer stated staff contacted other agencies that have worked with <br />this contractor since the last project and found he was doing adequate work while requiring more <br />supervision. There were no communities, including Coon Rapids, that feel he was an irresponsible <br />contractor so staff recommended the award to the low bidder. <br /> <br />Councilmember Daniels noted the second low bid was only $7,000 in difference and asked if, due to the low <br />City staff level, it would be better spent to consider the second low bidder who would not need additional <br />City staff supervision. <br /> <br />The City Attorney advised State law requires award of the bid to the lowest responsible bidder. He advised <br />that not completing a job on time might constitute reason for the awarding agency to not consider that bidder <br />a responsible bidder. He stated his understanding that the past problems with this contractor resulted in <br />their low level of supervision. However, if staff believed they were not responsible the Council could award <br />to the second low bidder or reject all bids. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rose asked when the last time this contractor was used by the City of Blaine. The City <br />Engineer estimated 1995 or 1996 and pointed out that this contractor was also the low bidder on the <br />Buchanan Street project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rose noted the frequent turnover of construction crews so, since it's been four years, that <br />problem will probably not be on the crews today. She stated her support to consider the award with <br />notification to the contractor that the City will expect performance. <br /> <br />Council member Daniels asked if there was a method to hold back funding to cover the City's cost for <br />additional supervision. The City Engineer stated he was not aware how that could be accomplished. <br /> <br />The City Manager commented on a project of last year where the City was not happy with the construction <br />but the contractor returned to make the repair. He noted that the City has the opportunity to view the project <br />prior to authorizing final payment. <br /> <br />Action 99-316 (AI 10.4) <br /> <br />Moved by Councilmember Daniels, seconded by Councilmember Rose, that Resolution No. 99-174, UAccept <br />Bid for Zumbrota Street NE from 89th Lane NE to 90th Lane NE, Improvement Project No. 94-06E Non- <br />Spine; Edison Street NE from 85th Avenue NE to 87th Avenue NE Alignment, Improvement Project No. 94- <br />