My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-02-09 CC
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2000
>
2000-02-09 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2007 2:48:07 PM
Creation date
2/9/2007 2:47:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />FE3- 4-08 F~J i2:4i <br /> <br />CITY OF HUGO <br /> <br />~AX NO, 6~14262359 <br /> <br />P. O~ <br /> <br />Q. A~ ~~plication fee set oy the ~ity ~dm~ni~tratQr. S~~~ <br />fee shall be a good faith estimate of the ~ctu~l costs to =e <br />incu~red by the City ~n process1ng th~ ~ppllcation. <br /> <br />Subd. B. All ilppl1c:ations 10r' motorized rec'-eational vehicle t!'""Olils <br />sh~ll ~e review~d by the Cltv Council. In determlnin; whe~her to <br />gr~nt permi~~ion for ~ tr~il. the Coun~il ~h~ll con~lder the <br />folloP'lingl <br /> <br />L The public need for- the proposed trai 1 Clt the lQcdtion and <br /> scale p:"'oposed. <br />.... Fotentilll impilct of the trail 0;1 c\cJi\.;ent pr-ope:- ty owner-IS. <br />.!.:. . <br />... F'otential impact of the prOPQse::! trC\1.1 on futu".e Ci ty <br />'." . <br /> development. <br />4. Pot~ntiWll imp.u:t 01 thii pr"opose-d trail or. en\lH'cnm~r,t=lly <br /> sensitivE? areas. <br />5. The adequacy 01 the proposed trilil to ~!lfel'j serve lt~ <br /> interrdod U!:I-It. <br />6. 51.\ c: h other c,..iter'.lB. laC!> the situatiun may re1~l.ll re:. <br /> <br />Swbd. C. The City Council sn~ll d~ny ~ll ~ppl~c~tior5 fer motorl:ed <br />recreational trails when the ~ppllcant has ~ot demonstrated to the <br />s~tisf~ction of ~ne Council: <br /> <br />1. The n~ed for' the proposed tra~l. <br />2. The adequscy ~nd ~atety of tne proposed tr~il to .~r'va ~ts <br />intended use. <br />3. The financial and operative ability of t~e applIcant to <br />constru~t, m~inti\in and oper~te the tr~il ~5 proposed. <br />4. rh~t the trail will not C6L1~e undue h~rd~hi~ ~~d/or <br />unreason~oly dis~upt the pe~~eful ~nJoy~~nt of th~ propertv <br />owners adj~cent to the propow~Q tr~ll (or t~. publiC). <br /> <br />Subd. D. The City Council m~y gr~nt permissio~ for- the construction. <br />m~lnt~n~nc~ ~nd operat1.on of ~ proposed tr~11 b~ re~clution wh~re ~t <br />has det~rm1n~d. ~t its ~ole di$c~etion, th~t such ~ tr~il is <br />w~rranted, f~asibl~, and in th~ b~5t lnter~~t of thG community. <br /> <br />Subd. E. In granting permission for the constr-uctlon1 m~intenan~e <br />~nd op~r~tion of ~ trail, the Council may gr~nt! in the authori~~ng <br />resolution, e~~mption5 f~om certaln Drovi~ion~ of the ordi~ance ~he~e <br />the situation or ~esign of th& trWliJ .0 warr~nt such exemptions 1" <br />th~ best interest of the City. <br /> <br />Subd. F. The Council may, in the authorizing resolLtlon, place <br />spe~i~l re5triction5~ re~ul~tion5 and condition5 on motori~ed <br />recreational vehicle tr.i15 when the situ~ticn or design of the tr~il <br />50 ~al"'r'ant. <br /> <br />Subd. G. Should it appeal'" to the Council that the terms and <br />conditions which it has placed upon a trail are not being adhc~ed to, <br />or that they ar~ not adequate. $uffi~ient. 01" nece5~ary to prote~t <br />th~ health, safety, and Nelf~r"e of the public~ then the Council may, <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.