My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-03-06 Packet
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2022
>
2007
>
2007-03-06 Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2007 12:06:42 PM
Creation date
3/2/2007 12:06:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Larkin <br />Hoifu'om! <br /> <br />Larldn Hoffman Daly & lindgren Ud. <br /> <br />1500 Wells Fargo Plaza <br />7900 Xerxes Avenue South <br />Minneapolis. Minnesota 55431-1194 <br /> <br />GENERAL: 952-835-3800 <br />FAX: 952-896.3333 <br />WEB: www.1arkinhoffman.com <br /> <br />February 28, 2007 <br /> <br />Members of the City of Centerville Planning Commission <br />City of Centerville <br />1880 Main Street <br />Centerville,~ 55038 <br /> <br />Re: 10-Foot Setback Variance for Lot 6 of the Hanzal Subdivision; Our File: 31,607-00 <br /> <br />Dear Members of the Planning Commission: <br /> <br />Our client, Jeff and Laura Hanzal ("Hanzal"), have applied for a variance from the City of <br />Centerville (the "City") R-2 Single-Family District setback requirements. Under the City Zoning <br />Code (the "Zoning Code"), the R-2 District requires a 35-foot front setback. Hanzal initially <br />applied for a 20-foot variance but are now reducing their request to a 10-foot variance from the <br />front setback requirement. <br /> <br />At the last Planning Commission on February 6,2007, the Hanzals presented the variance request <br />for Lot 6 of a six-lot Subdivision at 7381 Old Mill Road (the "Site"). The Planning Commission <br />found that the initial 20-foot variance satisfied the last four of the five total required findings <br />outlined in the City's variance application. The Planning Commission then tabled the application <br />regarding the first variance finding in order to allow the Hanzals time to determine the minimum <br />setback variance for Lot 6. As requested by the Planning Commission, the Hanzals have <br />reengineered the building plans for Lot 6 and have reduced their request to a 10-foot variance. <br />Even with the reduced variance request, Lot 6 continues to meet all other City requirements, <br />including the minimum building size. Lot 6 now provides a 1,300 square foot building <br />foundation, which exceeds the 1,050 square foot building size requirement under R-2 District <br />regulations. This amended variance request is illustrated on the enclosed Site Plan for Lot 6. <br /> <br />This letter amends the current application pending before the Planning Commission from a 20-foot <br />variance request to a 10-foot variance from the R-2 District 35-foot setback requirement. <br />Moreover, this letter explains that the Hanzal application satisfies the hardship standards under the <br />City's first required variance fmding as well as summarizes the findings for the other four variance <br />requirements. <br /> <br />L. Description of the Site. <br /> <br />Lot 6 is the Site's southernmost lot. The southwestern edge of the lot abuts Clearwater Creek. <br />Lot 6is subject to Rice Creek Rules that require 100-foot drainage easement from the centerline of <br />Clearwater Creek. Rice Creek Rule E.4. The 100-foot drainage easement significantly impacts <br />Lot 6 compared to the rest of the subdivision because it effectively removes approximately four- <br />fifths of the buildable area on Lot 6. In addition to the 100-;footdrainageeasement, there is also a <br />Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Floodway Line that similarly reduces the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.