My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-03-14 CC
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2007
>
2007-03-14 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2009 12:49:42 PM
Creation date
3/9/2007 2:52:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Centerville <br />Planning and Zoning Commission <br />January 2, 2007 <br /> <br />Ms. Norn1a Essex of 7333 Old Mill Road asked how far back is it from the road to the <br />bluff at the north and south end. <br /> <br />Ms. Essex indicated that they are concerned with putting homes 10 feet closer to the road <br />than they are. She then said that the whole creek area is prone to flooding with heavy <br />rains and snowmelt in the spring. <br /> <br />Mr. Hanzal explained that the home would be 15 to 20 feet back from the road and noted <br />that they have the flood way delineated on the plan. <br /> <br />Commissioner Love asked which areas are not R2 because most of the property is R2. <br /> <br />City Administrator Larson pointed out the R5 and PI zoning area of this property on the <br />map. <br /> <br />Mr. Kevin Kowarsch of 7354 Old Mill Road indicated that he lives across fi'om the south <br />lot and said that his major concern is the driveway since he lives across from it. He then <br />said that he feels it will be an eyesore looking at a building that is 15 feet closer than <br />required by Code. He further said that something like that will increase on street parking <br />and safety hazards for his kids and other kids in the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Mr. Grant Peters of 1817 Revoir Street questioned the R2 versus the R5 zoning as the lot <br />size seems to be in line with the neighborhood. He then asked why this needs to go to <br />R2. <br /> <br />Mr. Hanzal said the intention is to zone it all the same rather than having two parts of the <br />same lot zoned separately not to allow for smaller lots and smaller homes. <br /> <br />Mr. Peters asked if the value of the properties on the opposite side of the street would be <br />affected by R2 zoning versus R5. <br /> <br />The Commission said it would not. <br /> <br />Mr. Peters asked how the bluff drop ofT will be filled. <br /> <br />Mr. I-Ianzal indicated that a retaining wall would be engineered to address the fill in that <br />location. <br /> <br />Ms. Jodi West of 1825 Revoir Street said that she is concerned with the home being <br />closer to the road and she is concerned about her property value. <br /> <br />Chair Hanson said that usually there would not be a devaluation of property adjacent to <br />this property if it is rezoned to R2. He then said that the types of homes may affect <br />values. <br /> <br />Page 3 of8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.