My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-03-05 P&R
Centerville
>
Committees
>
Parks & Rec.
>
Agenda Packets
>
1997-2022
>
2003
>
2003-03-05 P&R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2007 1:11:08 PM
Creation date
3/16/2007 1:11:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />tervi[[e <br /> <br />'EstaGl1s/ied 1857 <br /> <br />STAFF REPORT <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />February 26, 2003 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />Kim Moore-Sykes, City Administrator ;t<itl:!J <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />Water and Street/Pavement Management Plans <br /> <br />....a......................................._............................. <br /> <br />As the result of the Council's decision regarding goals for 2003, whereby water issues <br />and street maintenance were listed as priorities, I met with the Finance Director and the <br />Public Works Director to discuss these priorities. The previous City Council had also <br />recognized these priorities as important and had asked the City engineer to estimate a cost <br />for putting together a street maintenance plan and a City water distribution plan. Mr. <br />Peterson estimated that it wo-uld cost about $15,000 for each plan. While Staff supported <br />this project despite the cost because "piece mealing" it is very costly and neither Staff nor <br />Council would have a clear vision of future projects without these plans. Also, without a <br />plan, there is no ability to make adjustments to future projects due to budgetary <br />constraints or mandates; no ability to look back at what was accomplished to assess <br />future needs; and no paper trail or history to allow future Councils to continue the <br />planning process. The previous Council decided not to order these plans done. <br /> <br />Staff continues to recommend that Council order the plans and perhaps there would be a <br />cost savings ifboth plans were done simultaneously. <br /> <br />. In addition, the three of us discussed the need to compile and with input from the Park <br />~ and Recreation Commission, implement a park maintenance schedule. Several items and <br />projects were discussed and costs were estimated for each project and item. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.