2007-03-28 Set Agenda & Handouts

Home Browse Search

City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes March 14,2007 Council Member Lakso questioned the proposed completion date of the park. Mr. Amundsen stated that it is the Committee's desire to have the park open sometime in July of 2007. Mayor Capra questioned the dollar amount requirement for bids/proposals. Attorney Glaser replied, $50,000. Mr. Amundsen stated that the only bid at this time is for the construction/materials for the pavilion. VII. OLD BUSINESS 1. Plannin2 & Zonin2 Commission's Recommendation: Hanzal Subdivision a. Resolution #07-008, Approving Comprehensive Plan Amendment b. Proposed Ordinance #18, Second Series, Rezone from P-l (Public/Semi- Public) and From R-5 (Single Family Residential Estate) to R-2 (Single Family Residential) c. Preliminary Plat Approval d. Request for Variance (Lot 6) Mayor Capra stated additional information and comments on this issue would not be addressed as several public hearings had been held over the past three months. She stated that all residents had been notified in writing within 350' of the proposed development of the public hearings per State Statute. She stated, based on the recommendation of the City Attorney, she would not accept further statements or documentation on the subject. She mentioned individuals could submit additional information for inclusion in the file, but that those items will not be considered in the Council decision. Mayor Capra moved to the checklist on how the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council worked on all issues. City Attorney Glaser stated that fact finding was completed by the Planning and Zoning Commission through a series of meetings constituting public hearings. He stated the Hanzals requested a modification (10 foot variance) to the original submission. He pointed out additional comments were taken at that time. City Attorney Glaser explained that the Planning and Zoning Commission debated on the variance and made factual findings and recommendations. Attorney Glaser stated that the recommendations were then forwarded to Council for consideration. He stated the next step would be for Council to approve the variance requested, approve the associated comprehensive plan amendment and preliminary plat or deny same.. City Attorney Glaser defined the issues discussed concerning the variance. He stated the Planning and Zoning Commission struggled with the fact there is no right or wrong Page 5 of 13 t/;