Laserfiche WebLink
<br />APPEND IX B <br /> <br />EXERPTS FROM READINGS ABOUT HORACE CLEVELAND AND <br />FREDRICK LAW OLMSTED <br /> <br />The following excerpts are meant to l1elp tile reader betJer lInderstand tile plzilosopl1ies <br />and UJeories that were used in the forma.tion of tile park"master plan and site design, <br /> <br />Horace William Shaler Cleveland (Detember 16, 1814 - D~ember 5. 1900) belonged to that <br />remarkable generation of landscape architects which produced Fredrick Law Olmsted, Robert Morris <br />Copeland, and Charles Elliot. These worthy successors to Andrew Jackson Downing were genuine <br />radicals who proposed fundamental innovations in the form and structure of cities, Not only did <br />they lay the foundations fOf" the municipal park systems of today, but they created a new image of <br />the city as an urban-rural continuum,.pioneeret! in the development of city and regional planning, <br />instigated a revolt against the tyranny of the gridiron subdivision, and directed attention to the <br />neet! fof' coordinated physical and social planning inthe modem metropol1s. <br /> <br />Cleveland designed the park systems of MinneapOlis as well as Como park, Moniton Island. and Lake <br />Elmo Park in St. Paul. <br /> <br />None exceeded Cleveland's missionary zeal, his efforts to educate the Midwest to the importance of <br />creative landscape architecture for its homes and cities. None exceeded his conscience of the <br />landscape architect's social role and responsibility in an era when railroads and speculators were <br />producing towns wholesale in the West, engaging in a form of pseUdo-planning wherein mechanical <br />regularity substituted for the adaptation of sites to topography, function, and long-term community <br />needs. Cleveland always insistet! that the landscape architect, whether involved in the home- <br />building or city-building process, satisfiet! a primary and not mereiy a secondary, decorative <br />purpose. -Landscape Architecture in the art of arranging land so as to adapt it most conveniently, <br />economically and gracefUlly, to any of the variet! wants of civilization.' No amount of detorative <br />elaboration could compensate for a poorly conceived original design of arrangement. wbich <br />ultimately determined the intrinsic expression_~f a place. <br /> <br />Cleveland conceived of the city as an artifact which best served human biological and social needs <br />when it both incorporated and improved upon nature. He aspired JO create an organic unity between <br />the man-made and natural environments, or a continuum in which man experienced the advantages of <br />both. The development of a comprehensive, integratet! park-boulevard system was pivotal to this <br />end. and their efforts to create m~nicipal park systems constituted an important root of modern-day <br />city and regional planning. Park development on a large scale required long-range planning; cities <br />had to aquire land in advance of need, before aquisition costs became prohibitive and choice <br />locations were usurped for private subdivision. <br />