Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TABLE 4-S.06A <br /> <br />a <br />Comparison of Statewide and Regional Rankings of Facility Response Groups <br /> <br />Note: Rankings are in terms of "Desire MoreN'responses. <br />A rank of '1' has the most "Desire More" responses. <br /> <br />Facili ty Statewide <br />F;. <br /> <br />-~Rank by Region--------- <br /> <br />'esponse - <br />Group Rank <br /> 1 :2 ;) 4 5 6E 6W 7E 7W 8 9 10 11 <br /> . <br />Tra.~i 1 ~. ~ 3 33 1 3 3 1 2 2 1 1 <br />4- <br />Garde I. ~ 1 1 1 , 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 3 3 <br />~;at:er 3 4 3 :2 4 :2 3 2 .: :2 3 4 2 2 <br />huntinc; 4 :; 4 4 ~ 4 5 5 4 4 5 3 4 '4 <br />Thrill 5 S 6 5 5 S 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 <br />Athletic 6 6 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 <br /> - <br /> <br />Number of Regional Ranks <br /> that are: <br />Same as Within Within <br />State a Rank a Rank of <br /> of one Two of <br /> of State state <br /> 4 4 5 <br /> 1 ,12 a <br /> 3 .10 0 <br /> 7 5 1 <br /> 9 4 0 <br /> 12 1 0 <br />Total 36 36 6 <br /> <br />a ' <br />Source: Minnesuta Department of Natural Resources, Office of Planning, Sta.te <br />Comprehensive OUtdoor Recreation PlAn. Data are fram a 1984 survey of <br />resideI~ househulds. <br /> <br />4.059 <br />