Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The Law and American Indian burial mound protection <br /> <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />Executive Order 13007--lndian Sacred Sites <br /> <br />Executi ve Order 13007, Indian Sacred Sites, 1996 24 May. <br /> <br />Indian Tribes and the Section 106 Review Process <br /> <br />Indian Tribes and the Section 106 Review Process at the website for the Advisory <br />Council on Historic Preservation. <br /> <br />The Citizen's Guide to Section 106 <br /> <br />Revised Section 106 Regulations. Final Rule. 2001 11 January. <br /> <br />American Indian Religious Freedom Act <br /> <br />This First Amendment Cyber- Tribune page shows the text of the American Indian <br />Religious Freedom Act enacted August 11, 1978, which states it's the "policy of the <br />United States to protect and preserve for American Indians their inherent right of <br />freedom to believe, express, and exercise the traditional religions of the American <br />Indian, Eskimo, Aleut, and Native Hawaiians, including but not limited to access to <br />sites, use and possession of sacred objects, and the freedom to worship through <br />ceremonials and traditional rites." <br /> <br />American Indian Reli~ious Freedom Act Amendments of 1994 may be viewed at "The <br />Vaults ofErowid." <br /> <br />Court Cases <br /> <br />The G-O Road <br /> <br />Read about the G-O Road Case - - article by Andy Cochrane. <br /> <br />In 1957, the GO road, or Gasquet-Orleans Road, which would <br />allow logging of a remote area "rich in Conifers", began <br />construction in what is now the Six Rivers National Forest in the <br />Siskyou Mountain Range. 1973 brought the first public Indian <br />opposition to it, on the grounds the road would go through an <br />area where Yurok sacred ceremonies were practiced. A number <br />oflegal battles followed, and in 1987, on the back of the 1978 <br />Indian Religious Freedom Act, the case made its way to the <br />Supreme Court. An injunction against the completion of the road <br />was overturned 5-3. Sandra Day O'Connor stated the <br />construction of the road wouldn't prohibit Indians :from <br />practicing their religion, likening the government's right to build <br />a road on its own property to its right to issue every citizen a <br />social security number. Justice William Brennan, writing the <br />dissenting opinion, stated this decision left the Ind ians with no <br />constitutional recourse to the gravest threats to their religious <br />practices. Meanwhile, on the Environmentalist front, "efforts <br />were being made to close the corridor in the Wilderness Area. In <br />1990, as a rider to the bill that established the Smith River Wild <br />and Scenic National Recreation Area, the matter was finally <br />decided, and the corridor was closed. The uncompleted section <br /> <br />http://www.ibsgwatch.imagedjinn.comllearnllaws.htm <br /> <br />6/8/2004 <br />