My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-02-03 P & Z Packet
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2022
>
2004
>
2004-02-03 P & Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/11/2007 1:44:20 PM
Creation date
4/11/2007 1:44:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning & Zoning Commission <br />January 6, 2004 <br />Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />presented a plan to the Commission to have the City of Centerville annex the property <br />from Lino Lakes so that the development could proceed. <br /> <br />Mr. Gleason indicated that he would be going before the Planning Commission and <br />Council in Lino Lakes to discuss the matter. <br /> <br />The Commission asked that Mr. Gleason and Staff keep them apprised of how things <br />proceed with Lino Lakes. <br /> <br />3. Sedona Homes Concept Plan for 20th Avenue <br /> <br />Mr. Keleher provided an overview of his revised proposal for development along 20th <br />Avenue eXplaining that they would like to incorporate some senior housing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Klennert Hunt asked for the price range of the proposed townhomes. <br /> <br />Mr. Keleher indicated that the average price of the townhomes is projected to be <br />$185,000 to $195,000. <br /> <br />The Commission inquired as to the length of the TIF district that Sedona Homes is <br />proposmg. <br /> <br />Mr. Keleher indicated they are proposing 10 to 15 years. <br /> <br />Chair Hanson indicated that his neighbors are interested in this type of project because it <br />would be less of an impact than some of the other allowed uses for the property. <br /> <br />The Commission positively received the proposal and expressed an interest in further <br />discussing it. <br /> <br />VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br /> <br />1. Ordinance #4 - New Format Continues Next Month <br /> <br />a. Swimming Pool Fencing Requirements - Removed from Building Code <br />but not City Code <br /> <br />Staff indicated that the Building Code does not have a swimming pool fencing <br />requirement but said the matter is being reviewed and Staff expects a change. <br /> <br />The Commission agreed to wait to discuss the City's Code with regard to swimming pool <br />fences until a change is made. <br /> <br />Chair Hanson told the Commissioners that the mini-storage people left town because they <br />were unable to resolve the property issues. <br /> <br />Page 2 of3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.