Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Parks & Recreation Committee <br />Meeting Minutes June 6, 2007 <br /> <br />Administrator and Public Works. Mr. Slettery felt lilac bushes were not enough of a division <br />between the properties. Mr. Slettery asked if park hours were going to be posted, what they <br />would be and would they be strictly enforced. He also suggested a gate be put at both Hidden <br />Spring and Laurie LaMotte Memorial Parks that could be closed when the park was closed as he <br />felt there are misuses of both parks. <br /> <br />Mr. Jack McDonald, 6901 LaMotte Drive, was concerned about the lake quality and requested <br />the committee contact Anoka County, Rice Creek Watershed District and the DNR regarding <br />getting help to clean up the weeds and algae in the lake. Vice-Chairperson Amundsen assured the <br />residents in attendance that the committee was in contact with all of the above agencies and was <br />doing everything possible to make this park an environmentally friendly park. He reiterated this <br />will be an adult park. There will not be a dock, pier or boat launch at this park and after the lake <br />shore restoration is completed it is the committee's desire to have it posted as no fishing or <br />swimming. The residents were in favor of the no fishing or swimming as they felt that would <br />eliminate some of the potential problems. <br /> <br />Mrs. Dorothy Mastro, 1553 LaMotte Drive, added her concern for the speed of traffic going <br />down LaMotte Drive, particularly during ball games and suggested signage reflecting Children at <br />Play or something similar. Chairperson Seeley stated there will not be parking at Hidden Spring <br />Park, but a crosswalk going to the parking lot at Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park. This may cause <br />some traffic concerns in the beginning. <br /> <br />Chairperson Seeley repeated the concerns of the residents and stated, as a Park Board, we try and <br />balance the needs of the community with the needs of property owners abutting parks. <br />Chairperson Seeley stated if we close the park up with too much fencing we will not be able to <br />get the policing we need and that is why the fence and lilacs were removed from the front of the <br />property. The lilacs were available and while the cost to relocate them was too expensive, the <br />committee still favors a hedge of lilacs along the south property line. Concerning whom do <br />residents contact regarding problems at the park, Chairperson Seeley said the best option is the <br />police. There is nothing the committee or the City can do if there are problems in the evening, <br />the police will monitor it on a regular basis and any possible problems hopefully will be headed <br />off right away. <br /> <br />Mr. Slettery asked if the committee was in favor of boundary on the property line, such as a <br />fence. Chairperson Seeley said the committee would have to discuss it. The committee was not <br />in favor of a berm or privacy fence, though Mr. Slettery was certainly within his rights to put up a <br />fence if he so desired. Chairperson Seeley did say the committee would look at posting private <br />property signage. Mr. Mastro said he had talked to Mr. Bill Tschida, St. Paul Water Utility, <br />regarding people fishing from their property in front of the pump house. Mr. Tschida stated they <br />would consider adding on to the existing fence extending it to the water's edge to discourage <br />people fishing from this property. Council Member Lee said it may not be possible, as it would <br />also involve the City, RCWD and the DNR. <br /> <br />Chairperson Seeley thanked the group for coming and their valuable input. <br /> <br />30f7 <br />