2007-09-12 CC Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

29. Cumulative impacts Minnesota Rule part 4410.1700, subpart 7, item B requires that the RGU consider the "cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects" when determining the need for an environmental impact statement. Identify any past, present or reasonably foreseeable future projects that may interact with the project described in this EA W in such a way as to cause cumulative impacts. Describe the nature of the cumulative impacts and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to cumulative impacts (or discuss each cumulative impact under appropriate item(s) elsewhere on this form). Cumulative impacts are not expected to result from the project, nor is it expected to interact negatively with any existing or future development. Anoka County is currently undertaking the reconstruction of CSAH 14. This reconstruction was not initiated by the proposed redevelopment. Anoka County State Aid Higway (CSAH) 21 is proposed to be reconstructed in conjunction with the redevelopment of downtown Centerville. The reconstruction will be confined to the redevelopment area. The City, independently or through agreement with the developer, will reconstruct side streets within the study area during this same period. 30.0ther potential environmental impacts If the project may cause any adverse environmental impacts not addressed by items 1 to 28, identify and discuss them here, along with any proposed mitigation. Impacts in addition to those discussed previously in this EA Ware not anticipated. 31.Summary of issues Do not complete this section if the EA W is being done for EIS scoping; instead, address relevant issues in the draft Scoping Decision document, which must accompany the EA W. List any impacts and issues identified above that may require further investigation before the project is begun. Discuss any alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or may be considered for these impacts and issues, including those that have been or may be ordered as permit conditions. The project proposer must acquire the previously mentioned permits and approvals prior to proceeding with construction. Temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control plans and a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) must be prepared. Issues that will require additional investigation include: . The wetland identified within the redevelopment area must be delineated. The delineation report will need to be submitted for review and approval to the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) as the Local Governmental Unit (LGU) responsible for 25