My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-09-12 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2007
>
2007-09-12 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2010 2:43:32 PM
Creation date
9/7/2007 3:53:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Noise and Air Quality Analysis <br />Centerville EA W <br /> <br />been acquired. While this exemption likely exempts the noise from the area roadways <br />from the Minnesota noise rules, the rules do provide a basis for evaluating the <br />appropriateness of areas along the roadways for specific land uses. For example, the <br />daytime standards for NAC-l areas are based on speech interference, and the nighttime <br />standards for NAC-l are based on sleep interference in bedrooms with partially open <br />windows. <br /> <br />2.2 Noise Monitoring and Modeling Comparisons <br /> <br />In order to help define existing project-area noise levels, and to check calibration on the <br />Minnoise computer model, SBP conducted monitoring at two locations near the proposed <br />development site. The monitoring locations (Ml and M2) are along Main Street and <br />Centerville Road, respectively. The locations are shown in Figure 1. <br /> <br />Traffic counts were conducted during the monitoring periods and the data was entered <br />into the Minnoise model to compare the actual monitored noise level to the modeled <br />noise level. The following table presents the results of this comparison: <br /> <br />T bl 1 N' M 't . R Its d C <br /> <br />t M d r <br /> <br />a e - Olse om ormg esu an ompanson 0 o emg <br /> Decibels, A-Weighted <br /> Monitored Modeled Difference <br /> Location Date Time <br /> LIO Lso LIO Lso LIO Lso <br />Ml 8/24/07 2:03 to 59 53 58 53 1 0 <br /> 3:03 pm <br />M2 8/24/07 3:18 - 57 49 58 51 1 2 <br /> 4: 18 pm <br /> <br />The modeled noise levels are in relatively good agreement with the monitoring results. <br /> <br />2.3 Traffic Noise Modeling Results <br /> <br />U sing the Minnoise computer model and traffic and roadway information provided by <br />Bonestroo, SBP estimated existing and post-development noise levels at receptor <br />locations on the proposed site. The receptor locations are shown in Figure 1. Receptors <br />R I - R9 represent residential buildings. Receptors C 1 - C6 represent buildings with first <br />floor commercial uses (upper floor residential). Noise levels were analyzed for the <br />existing (2007) and post-development years, 2012, and 2030. <br /> <br />SBP also estimated the change in noise levels that would occur along roadways serving <br />the redevelopment area due to the growth in traffic volumes between 2007 and 2012. <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.