Laserfiche WebLink
<br />to corrtinueto-workon the ftoodwayissues: Motion-carriedunanimouslr <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Police Report <br />Officer Jensen reported that the- Police- :E>epaI lmem-monrtored72il2 Street, - arrdtJnityAvemre-,~or <br />two and half hour intervals and there has not been a problem with vehicle speed. <br /> <br />OfficerJ enserrmentioned thartlre-school zone-lights-lrave-slowedtraffic, however,-wherrthe-ligttts <br />go off the traffic speed increases. J <br /> <br />NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br />Turtleman Triathlon <br />Mr. March gave a brief overview ofthe Turtleman TriatWon and that a section of the triathh:>n <br />includes the Centerville jurisdiction, Officer- Jensen. said in past years the Triathlon-has not-been a <br />~~. J <br /> <br />Motiorrby Councihnember Nelson; st::l'ulllled by eouncilme-mberBrennerto- apVI uve the <br />Turtleman Triathlon event. Motion carried unanimously. I <br /> <br />) Consider-Reallocation of Assessmeq.ts <br />Ms. Gaustad reported the City received a request to consider to reallocate an assessment amOtJllt <br />Hem- R& R Leasing to Terminal-Transport; She-further e"*plained that the GityassessedJhe- <br />properties along 20th Avenue for sewer and water improvements. At that time, the CouAcil <br />electedto allocate the cost to lrenef:ited- properties-according to square footage: One of Mr. <br />Rehbein's 38 acre parcels was no exception, and thus assessed accordingly ($152,498.77). -Mr. <br />Coatney (owner-of Terminal Transport)- was- irrthe-process-ofpurchasing the property amt~ed <br />a purchase agreement when the assessment was placed on the property. In their signed ) <br />agreement, Mr: Rehbein and Mr. Coatrreyagreedthat 'ferminat Transport, Inc: wouldbe <br />responsible for paying their assessment respective to the square footage purchased. The two men <br />agreed thatMr: Coatney's assessmentTesponsibilityis $3tT,548.12, and this amountwould-ue <br />assessed to his property until the term date of year 2008. Mr. Rehbein also entered into a siIriilar <br />agreement with Royal Oakes RealiwtttOO;OOO) containing corresponding stipulalionsregarding <br />assessments. However, this practice is not usually exercised by Cities. Under the stated \ <br />circumstances, Mr. Rehbein requeststhatthe- Ciry-authorize-Staffto reallocate-the- assessment as <br />noted. Moreover, Ms. Gaustad did not recommend authorizing the acceptance of Royal Oak~ <br />agreement with Mr. Rehbein. However; Ms: Gaustad-did-comment that Staffinvolvementw~ld <br />be limited and did not foresee a problem accepting Terminal Transports purchase agreement, dius <br />assessing the property. Mr. H<Yeft-stated-thattherersnorcrproblem with the-Council-authorizing <br />I <br />and accepting one agreement and not the other. Councilmember Brenner suggested Staff draft a <br />resolution in regards to the issl\es. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Brenner, seconded-hyeounciimember Sweeney to- aulhol ize-~he <br />$30,548.12 special assessment to be assessed to Terminal Transports, Inc. property taxes <br /> <br />\ <br />) <br /> <br />6 <br />