Laserfiche WebLink
<br />League of Minnesota Cities 2008 Transportation Funding Policy Statement <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Issue: The League of Minnesota Cities recognizes that all Minnesota residents and businesses <br />benefit from a sound transportation system that offers diverse modes of travel. Current funding <br />for roads, bridges and transit systems across all government levels in the state is inadequate, and <br />Minnesota's transportation system is failing to meet needs pertaining to public safety, population <br />growth and economic development. <br /> <br />Due to fi.mding challenges, the state has delaycd regionally significant road construction and <br />reconstruction projects. Urban areas are experiencing growing congestion and are lagging behind <br />other regions in making transit investments. Rural roads are not being upgraded to meet modem <br />safety standards and are not serving the needs of industries that depend on the ability to transport <br />heavy loads. <br /> <br />Local roads, bridges, sidewalks and trails are critical components of Minnesota's transportation <br />infrastructurc. Cities, like the state, have inadequate resources to preserve and reconstruct aging <br />transportation infrastructure, and to build transportation infrastructure to servc ncw development. <br />Existing funding mechanisms such as municipal state aid (MSA), specialassessments and <br />bonding have limited applications, making it difficult for cities to address growing necds. <br />Further, as the state funding shortfall has grown, the trunk highway project co~;t participation <br />requirements imposcd on local units ofgovemment have increased dramatically. This burden <br />has been exacerbated by the state's use of trunk highway bonds as a funding source, because <br />under Minnesota's constitution, trunk highway bond dollars cannot be spent on local components <br />of trunk highway projects, and the bond dollars are not distributed through the Highway User <br />Tax Distribution Fund formula. Cost participation requirements put added prcssure on local <br />budgets, contributc to property tax increases and divcrt local resources from the over 39,000 lanc <br />miles in Minncsota under municipal jurisdiction. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Response: More resources must be dedicated to all components ofthe state's transportation <br />system, and local units of government must have access to resources and funding tools to <br />meet growing needs. The League of Minnesota Cities supports the following: <br />. acceleration ofthe phase-in ofthe constitutional dedication oflOO percent ofthe <br />motor vehicle sales tax (MVST) to transportation purposes; <br />. MVST distribution of 60 percent for roads and bridges, and 40 percent for transit; <br />. dedication ofthe sales tax on leased vehicles to transportation purposes; <br />. a permanent increase in the gas tax; <br />. indexing of the gas tax, provided there is a limit on how much the tax can be <br />increased for inflation in a given amount of time; <br />. increases in vehicle registration taxes (tah fees); <br />. trunk highway bonding, provided the Legislature implements reasonable <br />restrictions on the amount of debt service the state will incur, and provided the <br />Legislature appropriates funding to assist with local costs related to projects funded <br />with trunk highway bonds; <br />. general obligation bonding for local roads and bridges, particularly for routes of <br />regional significance; <br />. a sllles tax increase to fund tmnsportation needs; <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-34- <br />