Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r <br /> <br />Date: <br /> <br />February 6, 2008 <br /> <br />UJ&v-k <br /> <br />-;...,.. '\ I cr<- <br /> <br />To: <br />From: <br /> <br />Honorable Mayor, City Counal, City Administrator and Public Works Director <br />John Meyer, Finance Director <br /> <br />Subject: Study of collection methods for storm water management fees <br /> <br />The city currently collec1s storm water fees from all properties in the city based on the SAC unit assigned to that <br />property. This method may not be the fairest calculation because it does not consider the impervious surface on the <br />property that generates the required storm water management The lables below enumerate the consequence of <br />equalizing the square footage rate by property use. <br /> <br />COMPARISON OF SAC UNITS TO IMPERVIOUS SURFACE SQUARE FOOTAGE <br /> <br />Total <br /> <br />Residential <br /> <br />Commercial <br /> <br />SAC Unos <br />Impervious Surface <br /> <br />1,425 <br />4,342,310 <br /> <br />1,281 <br />2,882,250 <br /> <br />144 <br />1,460,060 <br /> <br />COMPARISON OF INCOME FROM SAC UNITS BY PROPERTY USE <br /> <br />Total <br /> <br />Residential <br /> <br />Commercial <br /> <br />$ 28,500 <br /> <br />$ <br /> <br />25,620 <br /> <br />$ <br /> <br />2,880 <br /> <br />COMPARISON OF INCOME BY SQUARE FOOTAGE BY PROPERTY USE <br /> <br />Total <br /> <br />Residential <br /> <br />Commercial <br /> <br />$ 00066 <br /> <br />$ <br /> <br />0.0089 <br /> <br />$ <br /> <br />0.0020 <br /> <br />CONSEQUENCE OF EQUALIZING SQUARE FOOTAGE RATE BY PROPERTY USE <br /> <br />Total <br /> <br />Residential <br /> <br />Commercial <br /> <br />$ 38,598 <br /> <br />$ <br /> <br />25,620 <br /> <br />$ <br /> <br />12,978 <br /> <br />Summation: <br /> <br />Increasing the commercial use square footage rate to the residential rate equalizes the cost of the <br />storm water system to the different property uses. Below is an illustration of the potential impact <br />this rate change would have on selected properties in the City. <br /> <br />SELECTED EXAMPLES OF THE IMPACT OF THIS RATE CHANGE <br /> Current Annual Rate Change <br /> Charge Annual Charge Difference PercenlaQe <br />Centerville Elementary $ 620 $ 1,136 $ 516 83.23% <br />Mueller Pipeliners $ 60 $ 1,049 $ 989 1648.88% <br />B & R PropMies $ 120 $ 793 $ 673 560.74% <br />Parish Center $ 100 $ 604 $ 504 503.56% <br />Creamery Apartments $ 200 $ 46 $ (154) -7694% <br />Northern Forest Products $ 40 $ 708 $ 668 1668.88% <br />Eagle Brook Church $ 220 $ 587 $ 367 166.67% <br />