Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City Council af the <br />City of Centerville held their regular meeting on June 14, 1989 at <br />City Hall. Acting Mayor Burgstahler called the meeting to order <br />at 7: 00 p. ma Pr'esent: Bur'gstahler', Pete:r.son, Pel tona Absent: <br />Neumann, Haberman. <br /> <br />Motion by Pelton, second by Peterson to approve the May 10, 1989 <br />City Council minutes with the following amendment: page 5, last <br />paragraph, last line; <br />-now reads: " higher density streets", <br />-amended to read: "arterial streets and collector streets", <br />motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Motion by Pelton, second by Burgstahler to approve the May 10, 1989 <br />closed meeting minutes, motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Motion by Pelton, second by Burgstahler to approve the May 24, 1989 <br />meeting minutes wittl ttle following amendment to page 5, thii"'d <br />paragraph; <br />- now reads: "payments were agreed upon in the development", <br />amended to r'ead: "paymerlts wer.e ag:ceed upon in t}le <br />development agreement", <br />motion carried unamimously. <br /> <br />OLD BUSINESS: <br /> <br />Council member Burgstahler noted in the Planning and Zoning public <br />hearing minutes of May 11, 1989 regarding a comprehensive plan that <br />page 35, number 24 of the plan the word "all terrain" should be <br />stricken. <br /> <br />Andrew Mack, City Planner, advised that he did notice this after <br />he had written his June 7, 1989 letter to the City Council, but <br />will take note of it again at this time and correct the deletion. <br /> <br />Barry Blomquist, City Attorney, was present to address his concerns <br />regarding the comprehensive plan. Blomquist noted several points. <br /> <br />-He had contacted Metropolitan Council regarding certain <br />language in the plan and that the City adopt the given plan <br />under certain guidelines. <br /> <br />-The tenor of the plan 1s up to the individual City. If there <br />is a conflict with the comprehensive plan in the zoning <br />ordinance, the zoning ordinance shall prevail. However, <br />ci ties may see revised legislation that may elevate the <br />importance of the comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />-His concern is the tenor of the plan, the language CQuld <br />create a problema He advised that this plan as drafted, even <br />with revised language, may present a problem to the City. <br /> <br />-He noted that it would be a question as to whether or not <br />