Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Meeting Minutes CC <br />pa.g(~ tw() <br />December 13, 1989 <br /> <br />required 80 foot width; <br />Ordinance #8, Section 43. PRELIMINARY PLAT. <br />- 43.01-2 - Not shown. <br />- 43.01-4 Permanent bUildinge and gtructures, <br />easements and section and corporate <br />lines within the tract to a distance of <br />100 feet beyond the tract are not shown. <br />- 43.02 - SITE MAP not shown. <br />4 (~ . () 3 -- T C)PC)g :r'a:ph ~y 1'1 () t s r1()Hrl . <br />- 43.03-2 - Not shown. <br />- 43.03-5 - Not shown. <br />- 43.05 - RESTRICTIONS not supplied. <br />rn () t i. () r1 c: a r l~ j ~ e d tl r1 ani In Cl 1.1 S 1 y . <br /> <br />kQ-t--.l'{i-d-t.tL_=-___i2rQiJlgJl.Q~_.#_4_ <br />Motion by Burgstahler, second by Peterson to request that a draft <br />amendment be drawn regarding lot width::; a.t building ::::etbacl\: <br />lines as they pertain to odd shaped lots; <br />the width at tbe setback line will be shown on the prelllYLlnary <br />J;)Jat, <br />motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />~1_9_aB_ --_S_tJ::'_ e ~-~._--Q-Y~~r _1,g_Y <br />The C~ity C:C)Lln(:~il reviewed a <br />County Engineer, dated December <br />Overlay. A copy of this <br />Clerk/Administrator. <br /> <br />letter from Jon Olson, Assistant <br />12, 1989 regarding 1989 Street <br />1 e t t, e l' l ~3 () rJ f i 18 \~ i t h t }i e <br /> <br />}1ot ion by Neumann, second by Burgstah ler to pay Anoka Coun t.y fOl' <br />tbe 1989 Street Overlay in the amount of $15,299.76; <br />Ute amount to be paid includes a credit of $2,200 for substanda.rd <br />E:~ II d I) r () d 1...l C t ~ <br />motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />C_QIJll2r en_e np iy~_~~ HJ~:r.. _P_l_aJ:t___llQ d_~t e_ <br />Jobn Stewart, City Engineer, briefed the Council on the contents <br />()f the plan and was .:.lvailable for questions and commen ts. <br /> <br />Ci ty Council expressed C(lnCern over pO:3E;ible developments ne'rth <br />()f tLe northern Centerville C1 ty limits. It appeared that. t.he <br />consen:::;U8 of the Council was that while development. north ()f the <br />City limitE; may not be desirable, it. would be in the best <br />interest of the Ci ty to plan and be preparr:'~d shouJd cleve] opmf~nt <br />() c: c? u r . <br /> <br />~:;tewar t also aclv ised the Counc i 1 t.ha t t.here appears to be a J arge <br />arn(lunts of clear water in the sewer system, that could be due to <br />infi} trc:lt.ion of surface water. He noted that the annual c;ost. to <br />the Cjty is approximat.ely $600 - $900 per year. At :3orne point <br />the Met.ropolitan Waste Control Commis:3ion will requLre that the <br />