Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Management Discussion and Analysis - Continued <br />May 29,2008 <br /> <br />Governmental activities. Governmental activities increased the City's net assets by $442,051, thereby accounting for 71 percent <br />of the total growth in the net assets of the City. Key elements of this increase are as follows: <br /> <br />Revenues <br />Program revenues <br />Charges for services <br />Operating grants and contributions <br />Capital grants and contributions <br />General revenues <br />Taxes <br />Property taxes/tax increments <br />Other taxes <br />Grants and contributions <br />not restricted to specific programs <br />Unrestricted investment earnings <br />Gain on sale of capital assets <br />Miscellaneous <br /> <br />Total revenues <br /> <br />Expenses <br />General government <br />Public safety <br />Public works <br />Culture and recreation <br />Economic development <br />Miscellaneous <br />Interest on long-term debt <br />Water <br />Sewer <br />Storm Water <br /> <br />Total expenses <br /> <br />Increase in net assets before <br />before capital contributions from <br />other funds and transfers <br />Capital contributions (to) from other fune <br />Transfers <br /> <br />Change in net assets <br />Net assets, January 1 <br /> <br />Net assets, December 31 <br /> <br />Changes in Net Assets <br /> <br />2007 <br /> <br />$ 545,825 <br />81,905 <br />436,460 <br /> <br />1,849,661 <br />1,724 <br /> <br />106,114 <br />195,859 <br />9,611 <br /> <br />3,227,159 <br /> <br />532,422 <br />999,935 <br />751,402 <br />134,706 <br />32,751 <br /> <br />333,892 <br /> <br />2,785,108 <br /> <br />442,051 <br /> <br />442,051 <br />8,902,734 <br /> <br />$ 9,344,785 <br /> <br />Governmental Activities <br /> <br />2006 <br /> <br />$ 416,135 <br />417,526 <br />1,402,196 <br /> <br />1,767,110 <br />5,642 <br /> <br />36,026 <br />210,512 <br /> <br />(3,190) <br /> <br />4,251,957 <br /> <br />538,308 <br />999,878 <br />423,484 <br />125,765 <br />398,064 <br />19,960 <br />231,974 <br /> <br />2,737,433 <br /> <br />1,514,524 <br />(839,504) <br />(233,802) <br /> <br />441,218 <br />8,461,516 <br /> <br />$ 8,902,734 <br /> <br />Increase <br />(Decrease) <br /> <br />$ 129,690 <br />(335,621) <br />(965,736) <br /> <br />82,551 <br />(3,918) <br /> <br />70,088 <br />(14,653) <br />9,611 <br />3,190 <br /> <br />(1,024,798) <br /> <br />(5,886) <br />57 <br />327,918 <br />8,941 <br />(365,313) <br />(19,960) <br />101,918 <br /> <br />47,675 <br /> <br />(1,072,473) <br />839,504 <br />233,802 <br /> <br />833 <br />441,218 <br /> <br />$ 442,051 <br /> <br />2007 <br /> <br />$ 599,309 <br /> <br />123,238 <br /> <br />164,677 <br />(4,320) <br /> <br />882,904 <br /> <br />308,855 <br />357,276 <br />33,893 <br /> <br />700,024 <br /> <br />182,880 <br /> <br />182,880 <br />10,572,810 <br /> <br />$ 10,755,690 <br /> <br />Business-type Activities <br /> <br />2006 <br /> <br />$ 699,051 <br /> <br />427,529 <br /> <br />100,803 <br /> <br />1,227,383 <br /> <br />349,563 <br />363,425 <br />23,996 <br /> <br />736,984 <br /> <br />490,399 <br />839,504 <br />233,802 <br /> <br />1,563,705 <br />9,009,105 <br /> <br />$ 10,572,810 <br /> <br />Increase <br />(Decrease) <br /> <br />$ (99,742) <br /> <br />(304,291) <br /> <br />63,874 <br />(4,320) <br /> <br />(344,479) <br /> <br />(40,708) <br />(6,149) <br />9,897 <br /> <br />(36,960) <br /> <br />(307,519) <br />(839,504) <br />(233,802) <br /> <br />(1,380,825) <br />1,563,705 <br /> <br />$ 182,880 <br /> <br />The decrease in program revenues for capital grants and contributions in governmental activities and business-type activities is attributed to less <br />private residential developments. Governmental activities revenues changed as a result of additional property tax receipts and the elimination of <br />the homestead credit state reduction. In total, governmental activities expenses remained unchanged. However, public works expenditures <br />increased as a result of a partial payment for the new public works facility and economic development declined because there were no additional <br />professional services required for pending development projects. <br /> <br />-VI- <br />