Laserfiche WebLink
City of Centerville <br />City Council Meeting <br />June 11, 2008 <br />Councilmember Paar made a motion, seconded by Council Member Lakso, that the <br />City require permits for street construction and the waiver of the fee would be <br />subiect to change if the performance slides. Motion carried (4/1). Councilmember <br />Broussard-Vickers opposed. <br />3. Sign for Public Works Building <br />City Administrator Larson requested that Council consider a sign for the new Public <br />Works Building. He added that a 3 X 5 sign would cost approximately $1,500. He stated <br />that they could not paint a sign directly on the wall as it would violate the City Code <br />relating to signs. <br />Mayor Capra requested that the City Council get more options. <br />City Administrator Larson stated that a directional road sign on County Road 54 should <br />be doable but that signage at the new location should be provided. <br />Staff was instructed to see if other less costly options are available. <br />4. Encroachment Agreement <br />City Administrator Larson stated that residents Steve and Jenny Dosh, 7095 Cottonwood <br />Court, requested approval to put a storage shed on the back corner of their property, <br />which would be on the utility & drainage easement. He added that it would be a 10 x 12 <br />shed, and there is a 25-foot easement. <br />Councilmember Lee stated that the only problem is that it is on an easement. He <br />suggested putting the shed on blocks in case it needs to be moved. <br />City Administrator Larson stated that Public Works Director Palzar does not think it will <br />cause any problems. <br />Jenny Dosh stated that as shown in the pictures, the back area is really wet but that <br />proposed location which is in the easement is higher ground. <br />Steve Dosh stated that the shed would be 10 feet north of the border. <br />City Administrator Larson stated that it would be better not to put in a concrete floor (in <br />case it would need to be moved). <br />Mr. Dosh stated that they would not put electric in the shed. <br />Councilmember Broussard-Vickers made a motion, seconded by Councilmember <br />Lakso, that the storage shed for 7095 Cottonwood be approved subiect to the <br />requirement that the landowner execute an encroachment agreement. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br />Page 11 of 15 <br />